Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679789›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2023

Housing-based syringe services programs to improve access to safer injecting equipment for people who inject drugs in Vancouver, Canada: a spatially oriented qualitative study.

Koharu Loulou Chayama, Cara Ng, Taylor Fleming, Will Small, Kimberly L Sue, Ryan McNeil

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Koharu Loulou ChayamaBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.
Cara NgBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.
Taylor FlemingBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.
Will SmallBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada.
Kimberly L SueProgram in Addiction Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Ryan McNeilBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, Canada. ryan.mcneil@yale.edu.
British Columbia Centre on Substance Use · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAYale University · US

Funding

An ethno-epidemiological study of the implementation and effectiveness of an innovative and comprehensive response to the opioid epidemicR01DA044181 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI Thomas Kerr, Ryan McNeil · 2017 to 2026
$4.0M
An ethno-epidemiological study to advance HIV prevention and treatment for PWUDR01DA043408 · NIDA · SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY · PI MCNEIL, RYAN, SMALL, WILL · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043408NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA044181
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHousing environments shape injection drug-related risks and harms and thus represent a critical implementation setting for syringe services programs (SSPs). As critical harm reduction measures, SSPs provide safe injecting equipment to people who inject drugs (PWID). Vancouver, Canada, has well-established syringe distribution programs through which PWID have low-threshold access to unlimited syringes and related injecting equipment, including through non-profit operated supportive housing and single-room occupancy hotels. This study examines the role of housing-based SSPs in distributing injecting equipment to PWID in Vancouver.

methodsBetween January and March 2020, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted in Vancouver with 26 PWID. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Salient themes were identified using inductive and deductive approaches.

resultsMany participants accessed SSPs in housing facilities and expressed preference for these programs over those offered at other locations and through other health and social services. Three major themes emerged to explain this preference. First, most participants injected in the buildings where they resided, and housing-based SSPs made injecting equipment available when and where it was most needed. Second, many participants preferred to avoid carrying syringes outside of the places where they inject due to fears that syringe possession may lead to criminal charges or confiscation of syringes and/or illicit drugs by police. Third, for some participants, anti-drug user stigma and concerns over unwillingly disclosing their drug use hindered access to SSPs outside of housing settings. Programs operated within housing facilities often offered greater client anonymity along with more supportive and less stigmatizing environments, particularly in the presence of peer staff.

conclusionThe current study advances understanding of access to injecting equipment in a setting with city-wide syringe distribution programs. Our findings underscore the benefits of housing-based SSPs and encourage the expansion of such services to maximize access to harm reduction supports for PWID.

Indexed as

Drug UsersSubstance Abuse, IntravenousCanadaHousingHumansQualitative ResearchHousingInjection drug usePeople who inject drugsSyringe services programs

Identifiers

PMID37679789
PMCPMC10483728
OpenAlexW4386508256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.