Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679784›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

The interaction between muscle pathophysiology, body mass, walking speed and ankle foot orthosis stiffness on walking energy cost: a predictive simulation study.

N F J Waterval, M M van der Krogt, K Veerkamp, T Geijtenbeek, J Harlaar, F Nollet, M A Brehm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N F J WatervalAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.f.waterval@amsterdamumc.nl.
M M van der KrogtAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K VeerkampAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T GeijtenbeekDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
J HarlaarDepartment of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
F NolletAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M A BrehmAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe stiffness of a dorsal leaf AFO that minimizes walking energy cost in people with plantarflexor weakness varies between individuals. Using predictive simulations, we studied the effects of plantarflexor weakness, passive plantarflexor stiffness, body mass, and walking speed on the optimal AFO stiffness for energy cost reduction.

methodsWe employed a planar, nine degrees-of-freedom musculoskeletal model, in which for validation maximal strength of the plantar flexors was reduced by 80%. Walking simulations, driven by minimizing a comprehensive cost function of which energy cost was the main contributor, were generated using a reflex-based controller. Simulations of walking without and with an AFO with stiffnesses between 0.9 and 8.7 Nm/degree were generated. After validation against experimental data of 11 people with plantarflexor weakness using the Root-mean-square error (RMSE), we systematically changed plantarflexor weakness (range 40-90% weakness), passive plantarflexor stiffness (range: 20-200% of normal), body mass (+ 30%) and walking speed (range: 0.8-1.2 m/s) in our baseline model to evaluate their effect on the optimal AFO stiffness for energy cost minimization.

resultsOur simulations had a RMSE < 2 for all lower limb joint kinetics and kinematics except the knee and hip power for walking without AFO. When systematically varying model parameters, more severe plantarflexor weakness, lower passive plantarflexor stiffness, higher body mass and walking speed increased the optimal AFO stiffness for energy cost minimization, with the largest effects for severity of plantarflexor weakness.

conclusionsOur forward simulations demonstrate that in individuals with bilateral plantarflexor the necessary AFO stiffness for walking energy cost minimization is largely affected by severity of plantarflexor weakness, while variation in walking speed, passive muscle stiffness and body mass influence the optimal stiffness to a lesser extent. That gait deviations without AFO are overestimated may have exaggerated the required support of the AFO to minimize walking energy cost. Future research should focus on improving predictive simulations in order to implement personalized predictions in usual care. Trial Registration Nederlands Trial Register 5170. Registration date: May 7th 2015.  http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5170.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesWalking SpeedAnkleFatigueHumansKnee JointMusclesWalking

Identifiers

PMID37679784
PMCPMC10483766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.