Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679682›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2023

Association between independent practice time and patient outcomes in the emergency department: a retrospective study of residents in three urban hospitals in Taiwan.

Yi-Ying Chen, Patrick Chow-In Ko, Chien-Yu Chi, Kah Meng Chong, Yen-Pin Chen, Chien-Hua Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi-Ying ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No 7, Chung Shan S Rd (Zhongshan S Rd), Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Patrick Chow-In KoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No 7, Chung Shan S Rd (Zhongshan S Rd), Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Chien-Yu ChiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch, Yunlin County, Douliu City, Taiwan.
Kah Meng ChongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No 7, Chung Shan S Rd (Zhongshan S Rd), Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yen-Pin Chen *Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No 7, Chung Shan S Rd (Zhongshan S Rd), Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan. f06945029@g.ntu.edu.tw.
Chien-Hua Huang *Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No 7, Chung Shan S Rd (Zhongshan S Rd), Zhongzheng District, Taipei City, Taiwan. chhuang5940@ntu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between the independent practice time of residents and the quality of care provided in the Emergency Department (ED) across three urban hospitals in Taiwan. The study focused on non-pediatric and non-obstetric complaints, aiming to provide insights into the optimal balance between resident autonomy and patient safety.

methodsA comprehensive retrospective study was conducted using de-identified electronic health records (EHRs) from the hospital's integrated medical database (iMD) from August 2015 to July 2019. The independent practice time was defined as the duration from the first medical order by a resident to the first modifications by the attending physician. The primary outcome was revisits to the ED within 72 h following discharge. Statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio and pyGAM.

resultsThe study identified several factors associated with shorter independent practice times (< 30 minutes), including older patient age, male sex, higher body temperature, higher heart rate, lower blood pressure, and the presence of certain comorbidities. Residents practicing independently for 30-120 minutes were associated with similar adjusted odds of patient revisits to the ED (OR 1.034, 95% CI 0.978-1.093) and no higher risk of 7-day mortality (OR 0.674, 95% CI 0.592-0.767) compared to the group with less autonomy. However, independent practice times exceeding 120 minutes were associated with higher odds of revisiting the ED within 72 h. For the group with 120-210 minutes of independent practice time, the OR was 1.113 (95% CI: 1.025-1.208, p = 0.011). For the group with > 210 minutes, the OR was 1.259 (95% CI: 1.094-1.449, p = 0.001), indicating an increased risk of adverse outcomes as the independent practice time increasing.

conclusionsThe study concludes that while providing residents an independent practice time between 30 to 120 minutes may be beneficial, caution should be exercised when this time exceeds 120 minutes. The findings underscore the importance of optimal supervision in enhancing patient care quality and safety. Further research is recommended to explore the long-term effects of different levels of resident autonomy on patient outcomes and the professional development of the residents themselves.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHospitals, UrbanBlood PressureHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTaiwanEmergency departmentPatient safetyPractice independenceResident autonomySupervision

Identifiers

PMID37679682
PMCPMC10483807
OpenAlexW4386517330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.