Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679667›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

Development and initial qualitative evaluation of a novel school-based nutrition intervention - COOKKIT (Cooking Kit for Kids).

Simon Pini, William Goodman, Elizabeth Raby, Chris McGinley, Aurora Perez-Cornago, Fiona Johnson, Rebecca J Beeken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Simon PiniLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. s.pini@leeds.ac.uk.
William GoodmanLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Elizabeth RabyHelen Hamlyn Centre for Design, Royal College of Art, London, UK.
Chris McGinleyHelen Hamlyn Centre for Design, Royal College of Art, London, UK.
Aurora Perez-CornagoNuffield Department of Population Health, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fiona JohnsonUniversity College London, London, UK.
Rebecca J BeekenLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBRoyal College of Art · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 23512Cancer Research UK 535866Cancer Research UK C60192/A28516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess weight and an unhealthy diet are risk factors for many cancers, and in high income countries, both are more prevalent among low income families. Dietary interventions targeting primary-school aged children (under 11) can improve healthy eating behaviours, but most are not designed to support the translation of skills learnt in the classroom to the home setting. This paper assessed attitudes and approaches to cooking and eating at home, and the potential to enhance engagement in healthy eating through the COOKKIT intervention.

methodsCOOKKIT is an intervention to deliver weekly cooking classes and supportive materials for low-income families to maintain healthy eating at home. Preliminary qualitative interviews were conducted with teachers and parent-child dyads from a range of primary schools in the UK to explore attitudes, barriers and facilitators for healthy eating and inform the development of COOKKIT. Following implementation, ten children (8-9 y/o) participated in post-intervention focus groups, alongside interviews with teaching staff and parents.

resultsThematic analysis identified five themes under which to discuss the children's experience of food, cooking and the impact of COOKKIT: Involving children in planning and buying food for the family; Engaging children in preparing meals at home; Trying to eat healthy meals together in the midst of busy lives; Role-modelling; and Balancing practicalities, information and engagement when delivering cooking classes.

conclusionsResults suggest COOKKIT provides engaging and easy to follow in-school resources for children and school staff with take-home kits facilitating continued engagement and reinforcing lessons learned in the home environment. Importantly, participants highlighted the combination of healthy eating information, applied practical skills and low costs could support families to continue following the COOKKIT advice beyond the intervention, suggesting further evaluation of COOKKIT is warranted.

Indexed as

CookingSchoolsChildDiet, HealthyFocus GroupsHumansMealsChildrenCookingLow-incomeNutritionQualitativeSchool

Identifiers

PMID37679667
PMCPMC10483801
OpenAlexW4386507882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.