Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679630›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Selection of Affibody Affinity Proteins from Phagemid Libraries.

Kim Anh Giang, Per-Åke Nygren, Johan Nilvebrant

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim Anh GiangDivision of Protein Engineering, School of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per-Åke NygrenDivision of Protein Engineering, School of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan NilvebrantDivision of Protein Engineering, School of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. johan.nilvebrant@biotech.kth.se.
KTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEScience for Life Laboratory · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herein, we describe a general protocol for the selection of target-binding affinity protein molecules from a phagemid-encoded library. The protocol is based on our experience with phage display selections of non-immunoglobulin affibody affinity proteins but can in principle be applied to perform biopanning experiments from any phage-displayed affinity protein library available in a similar phagemid vector. The procedure begins with an amplification of the library from frozen bacterial glycerol stocks via cultivation and helper phage superinfection, followed by a step-by-step instruction of target protein preparation, selection cycles, and post-selection analyses. The described procedures in this standard protocol are relatively conservative and rely on ordinary reagents and equipment available in most molecular biology laboratories.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesMolecular BiologyBioprospectingCell Surface Display TechniquesGene LibraryAffibodyAntigen preparationPhage displayPhage-ELISASignal normalization

Identifiers

PMID37679630
OpenAlexW4386523931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.