Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679623›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023

Antibody Selection via Phage Display in Microtiter Plates.

Stephan Steinke, Kristian Daniel Ralph Roth, Maximilian Ruschig, Nora Langreder, Saskia Polten, Kai-Thomas Schneider, Rico Ballmann, Giulio Russo, Kilian Johannes Karl Zilkens, Maren Schubert and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephan SteinkeInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Kristian Daniel Ralph RothInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Maximilian RuschigInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Nora LangrederInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Saskia PoltenInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Kai-Thomas SchneiderInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Rico BallmannInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Giulio RussoInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Kilian Johannes Karl ZilkensAbcalis GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
Maren SchubertInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Federico BertoglioInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Michael HustInstitut für Biochemie, Biotechnologie und Bioinformatik, Departments Biotechnology and Medical Biotechnology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany. m.hust@tu-braunschweig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most common and robust in vitro technology to generate monoclonal human antibodies is phage display. This technology is a widely used and powerful key technology for recombinant antibody selection. Phage display-derived antibodies are used as research tools, in diagnostic assays, and by 2022, 14 phage display-derived therapeutic antibodies were approved. In this review, we describe a fast high-throughput antibody (scFv) selection procedure in 96-well microtiter plates. The given detailed protocol allows the antibody selection ("panning"), screening, and identification of monoclonal antibodies in less than 2 weeks. Furthermore, we describe an on-rate panning approach for the selection of monoclonal antibodies with fast on-rates.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalBacteriophagesBiological AssayCell Surface Display TechniquesHumansTechnologyAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody fragmentsAntibody phage displayAntibody selectionMicrotiter plates (MTPs)Monoclonal antibodiesOn-rate panningPanningPhage displayscFv

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.