Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679611›Full record

ArticleLab animal2023

Development of two mouse strains conditionally expressing bright luciferases with distinct emission spectra as new tools for in vivo imaging.

Toshiaki Nakashiba, Katsunori Ogoh, Satoshi Iwano, Takashi Sugiyama, Saori Mizuno-Iijima, Kenichi Nakashima, Seiya Mizuno, Fumihiro Sugiyama, Atsushi Yoshiki, Atsushi Miyawaki and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab animal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. One-step Cre-loxP organism creation by TAx9.Communications biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Mammalian genome research resources available from the National BioResource Project in Japan.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Toshiaki NakashibaExperimental Animal Division, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan. toshiaki.nakashiba@riken.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-1919-9000
Katsunori OgohCorporate Research and Development Center, Olympus Corporation, Hachioji, Japan.
Satoshi IwanoLaboratory for Cell Function and Dynamics, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan.
Takashi SugiyamaCorporate Research and Development Center, Olympus Corporation, Hachioji, Japan.
Saori Mizuno-IijimaExperimental Animal Division, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kenichi NakashimaGene Engineering Division, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
Seiya MizunoLaboratory Animal Resource Center in Transborder Medical Research Center, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Fumihiro SugiyamaLaboratory Animal Resource Center in Transborder Medical Research Center, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Atsushi YoshikiExperimental Animal Division, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9450-5151
Atsushi MiyawakiLaboratory for Cell Function and Dynamics, RIKEN Center for Brain Science, Wako, Japan.
Kuniya AbeTechnology and Development Team for Mammalian Genome Dynamics, RIKEN BioResource Research Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
RIKEN BioResource Research Center · JPOlympus (Japan) · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JPRIKEN Center for Brain Science · JPUniversity of Miyazaki · JP

Funding

MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP26890026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) has been an invaluable noninvasive method to visualize molecular and cellular behaviors in laboratory animals. Bioluminescent reporter mice harboring luciferases for general use have been limited to a classical luciferase, Luc2, from Photinus pyralis, and have been extremely powerful for various in vivo studies. However, applicability of reporter mice for in vivo BLI could be further accelerated by increasing light intensity through the use of other luciferases and/or by improving the biodistribution of their substrates in the animal body. Here we created two Cre-dependent reporter mice incorporating luciferases oFluc derived from Pyrocoeli matsumurai and Akaluc, both of which had been reported previously to be brighter than Luc2 when using appropriate substrates; we then tested their bioluminescence in neural tissues and other organs in living mice. When expressed throughout the body, both luciferases emitted an intense yellow (oFluc) or far-red (Akaluc) light easily visible to the naked eye. oFluc and Akaluc were similarly bright in the pancreas for in vivo BLI; however, Akaluc was superior to oFluc for brain imaging, because its substrate, AkaLumine-HCl, was distributed to the brain more efficiently than the oFluc substrate, D-luciferin. We also demonstrated that the lights produced by oFluc and Akaluc were sufficiently spectrally distinct from each other for dual-color imaging in a single living mouse. Taken together, these novel bioluminescent reporter mice are an ideal source of cells with bright bioluminescence and may facilitate in vivo BLI of various tissues/organs for preclinical and biomedical research in combination with a wide variety of Cre-driver mice.

Indexed as

LuciferasesLuminescent MeasurementsAnimalsGenes, ReporterMiceMice, TransgenicLuciferases

Identifiers

PMID37679611
PMCPMC10533401
OpenAlexW4386495842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.