ReviewProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2024
Application of next-generation imaging in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.
Review in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics as a tool for predicting biochemical recurrence after total prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Pooled it
- Enzalutamide Monotherapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer With High-Risk Biochemical Recurrence: EMBARK Secondary End Points.The Journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Criteria Clinicians Use to Classify Patients as High Risk in Biochemically Recurrent Nonmetastatic Castration‑Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns for Patients with High-Risk Biochemically Recurrent Nonmetastatic Castration‑Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Enzalutamide in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: key findings from subsequent analyses of EMBARK and their implications in clinical practice.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Imaging assessment of prostate cancer recurrence: advances in detection of local and systemic relapse.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Enzalutamide in Men With High-Risk Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Rationale and Treatment Considerations From EMBARK.The Journal of urology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary interventional treatment occurs in approximately one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Next-generation imaging (NGI) can identify local and metastatic recurrence with greater sensitivity than conventional imaging, potentially allowing for more effective interventions. This narrative review examines the current clinical evidence on the utility of NGI for patients with BCR.
methodsA search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications on NGI applied to BCR. Given other relevant recent reviews on the topic, this review focused on papers published between January 2018 to May 2023.
resultsNGI technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, have demonstrated increased sensitivity and selectivity for diagnosing BCR at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations <2.0 ng/ml. Detection rates range between 46% and 50%, with decreasing PSA levels for choline (1-3 ng/ml), fluciclovine (0.5-1 ng/ml), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (0.2-0.49 ng/ml) PET radiotracers. Expert working groups and European and US medical societies recommend NGI for patients with BCR.
conclusionsAvailable data support the improved detection performance and selectivity of NGI modalities versus conventional imaging techniques; however, limited clinical evidence exists demonstrating the application of NGI to treatment decision-making and its impact on patient outcomes. The emergence of NGI and displacement of conventional imaging may require a reexamination of the current definitions of BCR, altering our understanding of early recurrence. Redefining the BCR disease state by formalizing the role of NGI in patient management decisions will facilitate greater alignment across research efforts and better reflect the published literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.