ArticleScientific reports2023
Effects of localization of uterine adenomyosis on clinical features and pregnancy outcome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenomyosis, Infertility and Maternal-Fetal Outcomes: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies Across Disease Phenotype-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Subtype-specific analysis of factors associated with assisted reproductive technology indication and live birth in patients with adenomyosis: a retrospective study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Adenomyosis and Endometrial Polyps: A Systematic Review of Coexistence Patterns and Diagnostic Contexts.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Menstrual fluid-derived small extracellular vesicles: a novel reservoir with distinct molecular signatures and implications for endometriosis etiopathology.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Association between pre-pregnancy uterine volume and preterm birth in women with adenomyosis: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Recurrence rates and associated risk factors after conservative surgery for adenomyosis: a retrospective study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Adenomyosis Localized in Both the Anterior and Posterior Myometrium Is Associated with Deep Rectal Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Adenomyosis-A Call for Awareness, Early Detection, and Effective Treatment Strategies: A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Current Understanding of Molecular Mechanisms in Adenomyosis-Associated Infertility and the Treatment Strategy for Assisted Reproductive Technology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The timing of adenomyosis diagnosis and its impact on pregnancy outcomes: a national population-based study.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024Article
- Women with Endometriosis-Who Is at Risk for Complications Associated with Pregnancy and Childbirth? A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A stacked machine learning-based classification model for endometriosis and adenomyosis: a retrospective cohort study utilizing peripheral blood and coagulation markers.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to implore the association among clinical features, long-term fertility outcomes and the anatomical location of adenomyosis identified by ultrasound. We collected data of non-pregnant patients between 20 and 40 years old who had undergone surgical exploration for benign gynecological conditions at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. A total of 158 women met the inclusion criteria and were allocated into three groups according to the ultrasound-determined adenomyosis anatomical location: anterior (Group A), posterior (Group B), both posterior and anterior (Group C). 44.3% (70/158) adenomyosis was located at the posterior side. History of miscarriage and parity were significantly higher in Group C (p = 0.036 and 0.001 respectively). Group C also had a higher concurrence rate of ovarian endometrioma (OEM) (80.4%, p = 0.002), pelvic adhesion (80.4%, P = 0.003) and the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) Score (median64, range2-100, P < 0.001), while a significantly lower rate of concurrent peritoneal endometriosis (P = 0.01). Group B showed a relative higher rate of coexistent heavy menstrual bleeding (28.6%, p = 0.04) and oviduct obstruction (24.3%, P = 0.038). Group A had a higher proportion of coexistent leiomyoma (53.1%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences between group A, B, and C in terms of pain symptoms, endometrial polyps, operation time, and endometriosis fertility index score and other basic characters (p > 0.05). During the follow-up, 59.2% (61/103) patients had clinical pregnancies, and 26.2% (16/61) of them experienced pregnancy loss. Total in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer pregnancy rate was 64.6% (42/65) and spontaneous pregnancy rate was 50.0% (19/38). The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant lower cumulative pregnancy rate in Group C than Group A and Group B (p = 0.01). Severe obstetric complications such as placenta previa, placenta accreta, preeclampsia, and preterm birth were only found in women with adenomyosis located in the posterior side. In conclusion, types of adenomyosis based on sonographic location had different clinical features and pregnancy outcome. Patients with adenomyosis lesion in both anterior and posterior sides had higher combination of OEM, pelvic adhesion and rAFS score.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.