Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37679401›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Positive and negative psychosocial impacts on cancer survivors.

Grace Yao, Jin-Shei Lai, Sofia F Garcia, Susan Yount, David Cella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Grace YaoDepartment of Psychology, College of Science, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106319, Taiwan (R.O.C.).
Jin-Shei LaiDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 625 N Michigan Ave, 21St Floor, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. js-lai@northwestern.edu.
Sofia F GarciaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Susan YountDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
David CellaDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, 60611, USA.
Northwestern University · USRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern UniversityNational Taiwan University · TW

Funding

The National Person-Centered Assessment Resource (PCAR)U2CCA186878 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2014 to 2018
$11.9M
QUALITY OF LIFE EVALUATION IN ONCOLOGYR01CA060068 · NCI · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CELLA, DAVID · 1995 to 2008
$4.8M
PROMIS Statistical CenterU54AR057951 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2009 to 2014
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA060068NCI NIH HHS U2C CA186878NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to understand psychosocial impacts on cancer survivors using the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Psychosocial Illness Impact banks. Cancer survivors (n = 509; age: 59.5 ± 1.4; 51.5% men) completed the PROMIS positive and negative illness impact items consisting of four sub-domains: self-concept (SC), social impact (SI), stress response (SR), and spirituality (Sp). Illness impact was defined as changed scores from items measuring "current" experiences to recalled experiences prior to cancer diagnosis. Descriptive statistics, effect sizes (ES), and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated at item and sub-domain levels. Analysis of variance was used to identify potentially influential factors on the impacts. Our study found survivors reported stronger positive than negative impacts (overall ES mean: 0.30 vs. 0.23) in general; and more moderate (ES ≧ 0.30) positive than negative impacts at the item level, 54.3% (25 of 46) and 40% (16 of 40) for positive and negative items, respectively. Participants reported more positive impacts on SI and Sp but more negative impacts on SR. The CV results showed more individual differences appeared on positive SC items. Younger survivors reported stronger positive and negative impacts. Women reported higher positive impacts. Survivors with higher education levels tended to have higher positive SI impacts, while those with a lower family income reported higher negative SI and negative SR impacts. We conclude positive and negative psychosocial impacts coexisted-the strength of impacts varied across sub-domains. Age, gender, education, and family income influenced the psychosocial impacts reported by survivors. These findings provide a foundation to develop interventions to strengthen positive and minimize negative impacts and improve cancer survivors' overall well-being.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsCorrelation of DataEducational StatusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID37679401
PMCPMC10485019
OpenAlexW4386498726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.