Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37678668›Full record

ArticleJournal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders2024

Value and limitations of postoperative duplex scans after endovenous thermal ablation.

Pavel Kibrik, Ali Basil Ali, Jesse Chait, Michael Arustamyan, Hason Khan, Sarah Mazurovsky, Ahmad Alsheekh, Natalie Marks, Anil Hingorani, Enrico Ascher

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pavel KibrikVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY. Electronic address: pkibrik@gmail.com.
Ali Basil AliVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Jesse ChaitVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Michael ArustamyanVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Hason KhanVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Sarah MazurovskyVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Ahmad AlsheekhVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Natalie MarksVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Anil HingoraniVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Enrico AscherVascular Institute of New York, Brooklyn, NY.
Vascular Institute of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) of the lower extremity veins has risen to become the main treatment modality for symptomatic venous reflux disease. One of the main reported side effects of EVTA is recanalization. As of today, there is no clear protocol as to when follow-up duplex ultrasound scans should be performed. However, the standard for postoperative duplex after truncal ablation is within 1 week of the procedure. Our aim is to try to find whether there is a particular time period when postoperative duplex ultrasound scans should be performed to allow us to best diagnose recanalization.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 9799 procedures in 3237 patients with chronic venous insufficiency owing to great, small, and anterior accessory saphenous vein insufficiency from 2012 to 2018. We excluded 466 perforator veins. All 9799 procedures were performed using EVTA in patients who failed to respond to conservative management initially. Postoperative duplex ultrasound scans were performed within 1 week (3-7 days postoperatively). We defined a successful obliteration as lack of color flow on postoperative scan. We defined symptomatic recanalization as presence of reflux on duplex ultrasound examination in the targeted vessel at follow-up with symptom recurrence. Follow-ups were performed every 3 months in the first year and every 6 months thereafter.

resultsPatient ages ranged from 15 to 99 years. The median patient age at the time of the procedures was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51-73 years). The median overall follow-up was 25 months (IQR, 4-56 months). The Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology (CEAP) class of all the procedures were: C1, 21; C2, 208; C3, 3585; C4, 4680; C5, 188; and C6, 1117. There were 145 redo procedures performed after symptomatic recanalization was diagnosed in patients. CEAP class of the redo patients were: C1, 0; C2, 2; C3, 49; C4, 70; C5, 5; and C6, 19.

conclusionsMost patients underwent a redo procedure performed within the first year after the initial procedure. Conversely, there was great variability as to when redo procedures were performed. Because there is no defined pattern as to when these symptomatic occurrences arise, it may not be required to perform postoperative duplex ultrasound scans after EVTA routinely, but instead when a patient comes back with symptoms such as swelling.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationLaser TherapyVaricose VeinsVenous InsufficiencyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansLower ExtremityMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSaphenous VeinTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultDuplex ultrasoundEndothermal ablationEVLARFA

Identifiers

PMID37678668
PMCPMC11523378
OpenAlexW4386531190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.