Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37676867›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Towards substitution of invasive telemetry: An integrated home cage concept for unobtrusive monitoring of objective physiological parameters in rodents.

Lucas Mösch, Janosch Kunczik, Lukas Breuer, Dorit Merhof, Peter Gass, Heidrun Potschka, Dietmar Zechner, Brigitte Vollmar, René Tolba, Christine Häger and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas MöschDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0041-2879
Janosch KunczikDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Lukas BreuerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Dorit MerhofChair of Image Processing, Faculty of Computer and Data Science, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany.
Peter GassResearch Group Animal Models in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden Württemberg, Germany.
Heidrun PotschkaInstitute of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Bavaria, Germany.
Dietmar ZechnerRudolf-Zenker-Institute of Experimental Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany.
Brigitte VollmarRudolf-Zenker-Institute of Experimental Surgery, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Germany.
René TolbaInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Christine HägerInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
André BleichInstitute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Lower Saxony, Germany.
Michael CzaplikDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
Carina Barbosa PereiraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.
RWTH Aachen University · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Rostock · DEHeidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a novel concept for a smart home cage design, tools, and software used to monitor the physiological parameters of mice and rats in animal-based experiments. The proposed system focuses on monitoring key clinical parameters, including heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature, and can also assess activity and circadian rhythm. As the basis of the smart home cage system, an in-depth analysis of the requirements was performed, including camera positioning, imaging system types, resolution, frame rates, external illumination, video acquisition, data storage, and synchronization. Two different camera perspectives were considered, and specific camera models, including two near-infrared and two thermal cameras, were selected to meet the requirements. The developed specifications, hardware models, and software are freely available via GitHub. During the first testing phase, the system demonstrated the potential of extracting vital parameters such as respiratory and heart rate. This technology has the potential to reduce the need for implantable sensors while providing reliable and accurate physiological data, leading to refinement and improvement in laboratory animal care.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationRodentiaAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBody TemperatureRatsTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID37676867
PMCPMC10484458
OpenAlexW4386495672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.