Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37676852›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Preferences of healthcare workers using tongue swabs for tuberculosis diagnosis during COVID-19.

Renée Codsi, Nicole A Errett, Angelique K Luabeya, Danelle Van As, Mark Hatherill, Adrienne E Shapiro, Katherine A Lochner, Alexandria R Vingino, Marlana J Kohn, Gerard A Cangelosi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Preferences for tongue swab versus sputum collection for TB testing: a multi-country survey.The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High-sensitivity detection ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. High-sensitivity detection ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tongue swab testing on two automated tuberculosis diagnostic platforms, Cepheid XpertmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Renée CodsiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Nicole A ErrettDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Angelique K LuabeyaSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI), Institute of Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Danelle Van AsSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI), Institute of Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mark HatherillSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI), Institute of Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Adrienne E ShapiroDepartments of Global Health and Medicine (Infectious Diseases) University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3106-1258
Katherine A LochnerDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-6433
Alexandria R VinginoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Marlana J KohnDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Gerard A CangelosiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0006-6520
University of Washington · USUniversity of Cape Town · ZAInfectious Disease Research Institute · US

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
The Center for Innovation in Point-of-Care Technologies for HIV/AIDS atNorthwestern University (C-THAN) Supplemental RequestU54EB027049 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Chad J Achenbach, SALLY Maureen MCFALL · 2018 to 2026
$24.0M
Novel clinic-based TB diagnostics and testing algorithms for persons with HIVK23AI140918 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SHAPIRO, ADRIENNE E · 2019 to 2024
$937k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI140918NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB027049NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) who come into contact with tuberculosis (TB) patients are at elevated risk of TB infection and disease. The collection and handling of sputum samples for TB diagnosis poses exposure risks to HCWs, particularly in settings where aerosol containment is limited. An alternative sample collection method, tongue swabbing, was designed to help mitigate this risk, and is under evaluation in multiple settings. This study assessed risk perceptions among South African HCWs who used tongue swabbing in TB diagnostic research during the COVID-19 pandemic. We characterized their context-specific preferences as well as the facilitators and barriers of tongue swab use in clinical and community settings. Participants (n = 18) were HCWs with experience using experimental tongue swabbing methods at the South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI). We used key informant semi-structured interviews to assess attitudes toward two tongue swab strategies: Provider-collected swabbing (PS) and supervised self-swabbing (SSS). Responses from these interviews were analyzed by rapid qualitative analysis and thematic analysis methods. Facilitators included aversion to sputum (PS and SSS), perceived safety of the method (SSS), and educational resources to train patients (SSS). Barriers included cultural stigmas, as well as personal security and control of their work environment when collecting swabs in community settings. COVID-19 risk perception was a significant barrier to the PS method. Motivators for HCW use of tongue swabbing differed substantially by use case, and whether the HCW has the authority and agency to implement safety precautions in specific settings. These findings point to a need for contextually specific educational resources to enhance safety of and adherence to the SSS collection method.

Identifiers

PMID37676852
PMCPMC10484421
OpenAlexW4386495659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.