Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37676673›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2023

Relative rate of expansion controls speed in one-dimensional pedestrian following.

Jiuyang Bai, William H Warren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Human Crowds as Social Networks: Collective Dynamics of Consensus and Polarization.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jiuyang BaiDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
William H WarrenDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.

Funding

A vision-based model of locomotion in crowded environmentsR01EY029745 · NEI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI WARREN, WILLIAM H · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029745
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patterns of crowd behavior are believed to result from local interactions between pedestrians. Many studies have investigated the local rules of interaction, such as steering, avoiding, and alignment, but how pedestrians control their walking speed when following another remains unsettled. Most pedestrian models assume the physical speed and distance of others as input. The present study compares such "omniscient" models with "visual" models based on optical variables. We experimentally tested eight speed control models from the pedestrian- and car-following literature. Walking participants were asked to follow a leader (a moving pole) in a virtual environment, while the leader's speed was perturbed during the trial. In Experiment 1, the leader's initial distance was varied. Each model was fit to the data and compared. The results showed that visual models based on optical expansion (\(\dot{\theta }\)) had the smallest root mean square error in speed across conditions, whereas other models exhibited increased error at longer distances. In Experiment 2, the leader's size (pole diameter) was varied. A model based on the relative rate of expansion (\(\dot{\theta }/\theta \)) performed better than the expansion rate model (\(\dot{\theta }\)), because it is less sensitive to leader size. Together, the results imply that pedestrians directly control their walking speed in one-dimensional following using relative rate of expansion, rather than the distal speed and distance of the leader.

Indexed as

PedestriansHumansWalking

Identifiers

PMID37676673
PMCPMC10494987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.