ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2023
Streamlining and Optimizing Strategies of Electrostatic Parameterization.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- DEGAUSS: A Novel Softcore Force Field Using Double Exponential van der Waals and Gaussian Charge for Molecular Dynamics Simulations I: Theory and Validation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Optimization of Lennard-Jones Parameters for Induced Dipole Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Isotropic Periodic Sum for Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Automated Refinement of Property-Specific Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Water Models Using Bayesian Black-Box Optimization.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Refinement of Atomic Polarizabilities for a Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Force Field with Simultaneous Considerations of Both Molecular Polarizability Tensors and In-Solution Electrostatic Potentials.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Performance Tuning of Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model in Molecular Dynamics Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- PCMRESP: A Method for Polarizable Force Field Parameter Development and Transferability of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Models Across Multiple Solvents.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Assessment of Amino Acid Electrostatic Parametrizations of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- AmberTools.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate characterization of electrostatic interactions is crucial in molecular simulation. Various methods and programs have been developed to obtain electrostatic parameters for additive or polarizable models to replicate electrostatic properties obtained from experimental measurements or theoretical calculations. Electrostatic potentials (ESPs), a set of physically well-defined observables from quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, are well suited for optimization efforts due to the ease of collecting a large amount of conformation-dependent data. However, a reliable set of QM ESP computed at an appropriate level of theory and atomic basis set is necessary. In addition, despite the recent development of the PyRESP program for electrostatic parameterizations of induced dipole-polarizable models, the time-consuming and error-prone input file preparation process has limited the widespread use of these protocols. This work aims to comprehensively evaluate the quality of QM ESPs derived by eight methods, including wave function methods such as Hartree-Fock (HF), second-order Møller-Plesset (MP2), and coupled cluster-singles and doubles (CCSD), as well as five hybrid density functional theory (DFT) methods, used in conjunction with 13 different basis sets. The highest theory levels CCSD/aug-cc-pV5Z (a5z) and MP2/aug-cc-pV5Z (a5z) were selected as benchmark data over two homemade data sets. The results show that the hybrid DFT method, ωB97X-D, combined with the aug-cc-pVTZ (a3z) basis set, performs well in reproducing ESPs while taking both accuracy and efficiency into consideration. Moreover, a flexible and user-friendly program called PyRESP_GEN was developed to streamline input file preparation. The restraining strengths, along with strategies for polarizable Gaussian multipole (pGM) model parameterizations, were also optimized. These findings and the program presented in this work facilitate the development and application of induced dipole-polarizable models, such as pGM models, for molecular simulations of both chemical and biological significance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.