Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37676590›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Computer-Aided Drug Discovery and Design: Recent Advances and Future Prospects.

Alan Talevi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Drug Discovery Strategies for Kallikrein-Related Peptidases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alan TaleviLaboratory of Bioactive Compound Research and Development (LIDeB), Faculty of Exact Sciences, National University of La Plata (UNLP), La Plata, Argentina. atalevi@biol.unlp.edu.ar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-aided drug discovery and design involve the use of information technologies to identify and develop, on a rational ground, chemical compounds that align a set of desired physicochemical and biological properties. In its most common form, it involves the identification and/or modification of an active scaffold (or the combination of known active scaffolds), although de novo drug design from scratch is also possible. Traditionally, the drug discovery and design processes have focused on the molecular determinants of the interactions between drug candidates and their known or intended pharmacological target(s). Nevertheless, in modern times, drug discovery and design are conceived as a particularly complex multiparameter optimization task, due to the complicated, often conflicting, property requirements.This chapter provides an updated overview of in silico approaches for identifying active scaffolds and guiding the subsequent optimization process. Recent groundbreaking advances in the field have also analyzed the integration of state-of-the-art machine learning approaches in every step of the drug discovery process (from prediction of target structure to customized molecular docking scoring functions), integration of multilevel omics data, and the use of a diversity of computational approaches to assist target validation and assess plausible binding pockets.

Indexed as

Drug DesignDrug DiscoveryAlgorithmsComputersHydrolasesMolecular Docking SimulationHydrolasesADMEADMETAntitargetCollaborative knowledgeCollective knowledgeComputer-aided drug designComputer-assisted drug designComputer-guided drug designCooperative knowledgeData integrationDeep learningDe novo drug designDrug designDruggabilityDruggability predictionEnsemble learningFragment-based drug designIn silico screeningLigand-based approachesMachine learningMolecular dynamicsMolecular optimizationMolecular targetOmicsOpen sourcePharmacological targetPharmacophorePocket predictionQSARStructure-based approachesTarget-based approachesTarget validationVirtual screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.