ReviewStress biology2022
VIGE: virus-induced genome editing for improving abiotic and biotic stress traits in plants.
Review in Stress biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Plant viruses as next-generation vectors for transgene-free genome editing, gene regulation, and rapid crop improvement.Plant molecular biology · 2026Review
- Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Transgene- and tissue culture-free heritable genome editing using RNA virus-based delivery in wheat.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Enhancing virus-mediated genome editing for cultivated tomato through low temperature.Plant cell reports · 2025Article
- Conventional gene stacking as a strategy to improve chickpea resistance to Ascochyta blight.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Unlocking regeneration potential: harnessing morphogenic regulators and small peptides for enhanced plant engineering.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025Review
- Tissue culture-independent approaches to revolutionizing plant transformation and gene editing.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Dancing with the enemy: symbiotic relationships between plant RNA viruses and their hosts.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Foxtail mosaic virus: A tool for gene function analysis in maize and other monocots.Molecular plant pathology · 2023Review
- CRISPR-Based Genome Editing Tools: An Accelerator in Crop Breeding for a Changing Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Gene Editing for Plant Resistance to Abiotic Factors: A Systematic Review.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- CRISPR technology towards genome editing of the perennial and semi-perennial crops citrus, coffee and sugarcane.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Recalcitrance to transformation, a hindrance for genome editing of legumes.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Barley stripe mosaic virus-mediated somatic and heritable gene editing in barley (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Review
- Potato virus X-delivered CRISPR activation programs lead to strong endogenous gene induction and transient metabolic reprogramming in Nicotiana benthamiana.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Plant biomacromolecule delivery methods in the 21st century.Frontiers in genome editing · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agricultural production is hampered by disease, pests, and environmental stresses. To minimize yield loss, it is important to develop crop cultivars with resistance or tolerance to their respective biotic and abiotic constraints. Transformation techniques are not optimized for many species and desirable cultivars may not be amenable to genetic transformation, necessitating inferior cultivar usage and time-consuming introgression through backcrossing to the preferred variety. Overcoming these limitations will greatly facilitate the development of disease, insect, and abiotic stress tolerant crops. One such avenue for rapid crop improvement is the development of viral systems to deliver CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technology to plants to generate targeted beneficial mutations. Viral delivery of genomic editing constructs can theoretically be applied to span the entire host range of the virus utilized, circumventing the challenges associated with traditional transformation and breeding techniques. Here we explore the types of viruses that have been optimized for CRISPR/Cas9 delivery, the phenotypic outcomes achieved in recent studies, and discuss the future potential of this rapidly advancing technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.