ReviewLasers in medical science2023
Thermal damage and the prognostic evaluation of laser ablation of bone tissue-a review.
Review in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Controllable Surface Structures of Hydroxyapatite Processed by Picosecond Laser in Air and Underwater: A Comparative Study of Experiment and Simulation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From bench to bedside: recent advances and effective strategies for improving laser bone ablation efficiency-a review.Lasers in medical science · 2025Review
- Global trends of laser bone ablation: bibliometric analysis of publications from 1979 to 2023.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Accuracy evaluation of robot-guided laser osteotomy for dental implant bed preparation - a digital high-tech procedure.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Robot-Guided Laser Osteotomy in Reconstruction with Patient-Specific Implants-An Accuracy Study of Digital High-Tech Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, an increasing number of scientists have focused on conducting experiments on laser ablation of bone tissue. The purpose of this study was to summarize the prognosis of tissue and the extent of thermal damage in past hard tissue ablation experiments, and review the evidence for the feasibility of laser osteotomy in surgery. An electronic search of PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Web of Science (WOS) for relevant English-language articles published through June 2023 was conducted. This review includes 48 literature reports on laser ablation of hard tissues from medical and biological perspectives. It summarizes previous studies in which the ideal ablation rate, depth of ablation, and minimal damage to bone tissue and surrounding soft tissues were achieved by changing the laser type, optimizing the laser parameter settings, or adding adjuvant devices. By observing their post-operative healing and inflammatory response, this review aims to provide a better understanding of pulsed laser ablation of hard tissues. Previous studies suggest that laser osteotomy has yielded encouraging results in bone resection procedures. We believe that low or even no thermal damage can be achieved by experimentally selecting a suitable laser type, optimizing laser parameters such as pulse duration and frequency, or adding additional auxiliary cooling devices. However, the lack of clinical studies makes it difficult to conclusively determine whether laser osteotomy is superior in clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.