Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37676504›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine2023

Sex and gender differences in intensive care medicine.

Hamid Merdji, Micah T Long, Marlies Ostermann, Margaret Herridge, Sheila N Myatra, Silvia De Rosa, Victoria Metaxa, Katarzyna Kotfis, Chiara Robba, Audrey De Jong and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
29.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Modelling the number of ICU beds, ICU length of stay, and ICU admission rates in Australia and New Zealand through to 2040: The PrognostICate Study.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Willingness and Ability to Pay for Critical Care Treatment for Non-COVID Illness during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Observational Study in a Tertiary Care Centre in India.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Differential disease tolerance mediates sex-biased illness severity in sepsis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 11 institutions in 9 countries.

Hamid MerdjiIntensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Micah T LongDepartments of Anaesthesiology and Medicine, Division of Critical Care, University of Wisconsin Hospitals & Clinics, Madison, USA.
Marlies OstermannDepartment of Critical Care, King's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Margaret HerridgeInstitute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sheila N MyatraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Silvia De RosaCentre for Medical Sciences - CISMed, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Victoria MetaxaDepartment of Critical Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katarzyna KotfisDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Therapy and Acute Intoxications, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Chiara RobbaDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche Integrate e Diagnostiche, Università di Genova, Genova, Italy.
Audrey De JongDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Regional University Hospital of Montpellier, St-Eloi Hospital, University of Montpellier, PhyMedExp, INSERM U1046, CNRS UMR, 9214, Montpellier, CEDEX 5, France.
Julie HelmsFaculté de Médecine, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA)Hôpitaux Universitaires de StrasbourgNouvel Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg, France.
Caroline E GebhardIntensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031, Basel, Switzerland. evacaroline.gebhard@usb.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-4975-2679
University of Basel · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHomi Bhabha National Institute · INInserm · FRKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITPomeranian Medical University · PLSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Trento · ITUW Health University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant advancements in critical care medicine, limited attention has been given to sex and gender disparities in management and outcomes of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). While "sex" pertains to biological and physiological characteristics, such as reproductive organs, chromosomes and sex hormones, "gender" refers more to sociocultural roles and human behavior. Unfortunately, data on gender-related topics in the ICU are lacking. Consequently, data on sex and gender-related differences in admission to the ICU, clinical course, length of stay, mortality, and post-ICU burdens, are often inconsistent. Moreover, when examining specific diagnoses in the ICU, variations can be observed in epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, severity, and treatment response due to the distinct impact of sex hormones on the immune and cardiovascular systems. In this narrative review, we highlight the influence of sex and gender on the clinical course, management, and outcomes of the most encountered intensive care conditions, in addition to the potential co-existence of unconscious biases which may also impact critical illness. Diagnoses with a known sex predilection will be discussed within the context of underlying sex differences in physiology, anatomy, and pharmacology with the goal of identifying areas where clinical improvement is needed. To optimize patient care and outcomes, it is crucial to comprehend and address sex and gender differences in the ICU setting and personalize management accordingly to ensure equitable, patient-centered care. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms driving sex and gender disparities, as well as exploring targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities and improve outcomes for all critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleSex FactorsAKIARDSCardiogenic shockCritical illnessPost-intensive care syndromeSeptic shockSex and gender differencesSex disparities

Identifiers

PMID37676504
PMCPMC10556182
OpenAlexW4386497781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.