Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37676071›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and risk of cancer: Findings from the Korean National Health Screening Cohort.

Chi Lan Tran, Minji Han, Byungmi Kim, Eun Young Park, Young Il Kim, Jin-Kyoung Oh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux and chronic kidney disease: A meta-analysis of 4 million patients.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Impact of referral delays on dysphagia outcomes in a Saudi tertiary center.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chi Lan TranDepartment of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Minji HanDepartment of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Byungmi KimDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Eun Young ParkDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young Il KimCenter for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
Jin-Kyoung OhDepartment of Cancer Control and Population Health, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9331-3054
National Cancer Center · KRKorea University · KRSeoul National University of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

National Cancer Center NCC2010303National Cancer Center NCC2310652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimLittle is known about the association of cancers other than esophageal adenocarcinoma with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to examine the association between GERD and the risk of different types of cancer.

methodsA cohort study was conducted using data from the National Health Screening Cohort. We included 10,261 GERD patients and 30,783 non-GERD individuals who were matched in a 1:3 ratio by age and sex. All participants were followed-up until cancer diagnosis, death, or end of the study (December 31, 2015). Hazard ratios were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model, adjusting for smoking and alcohol consumption, physical activity, body mass index, income, area, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

resultsThe median follow-up time was 9.9 years. GERD was associated with an increased risk of esophageal (adjusted hazard ratios [aHR] = 3.20 [1.89-5.41]), laryngeal (aHR = 5.42 [2.68-10.96]), and thyroid cancers (aHR = 1.91 [1.55-2.34]) after controlling for all covariates. The results were consistent when examining GERD with esophagitis (K210) and without esophagitis (K219) separately. For thyroid cancer, the results were insignificant after controlling for having ever-received thyroid biopsy procedures. A dose-response relationship was found between GERD and esophageal cancer as well as laryngeal cancer, with patients with a longer duration of GERD treatment showing a stronger effect. In contrast, GERD was associated with a reduced risk of colorectal (aHR = 0.73 [0.59-0.90]), liver (aHR = 0.67 [0.51-0.89]), and pancreatic cancers (aHR = 0.43 [0.24-0.76]), which might have resulted from differences in healthcare utilization between GERD and non-GERD groups.

conclusionGERD was associated with an increased risk of esophageal and laryngeal cancers. Additionally, early detection and treatment of precancerous lesions among the GERD group could lead to a lower risk of colorectal, liver, and pancreatic cancers.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsGastroesophageal RefluxLaryngeal NeoplasmsNeoplasmsThyroid NeoplasmsAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRepublic of KoreaRisk Factorscancer riskcohortgastroesophageal reflux diseaselaryngeal cancer

Identifiers

PMID37676071
PMCPMC10557881
OpenAlexW4386501997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.