Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37676061›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2024

Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity.

NithyaPriya Ramalingam, Jennifer Coury, Chrystal Barnes, Erin S Kenzie, Amanda F Petrik, Rajasekhara R Mummadi, Gloria Coronado, Melinda M Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impacts of pragmatic implementation science in a primary care laboratory.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

NithyaPriya RamalingamOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9418-2495
Jennifer CouryOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3597-9517
Chrystal BarnesOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Erin S KenzieOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Amanda F PetrikCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Rajasekhara R MummadiCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Gloria CoronadoCenter for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Melinda M DavisOregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3293-5113

Funding

Research ProgramP50CA244289 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, RACHEL · 2019 to 2023
$7.6M
Smarter CRC Supplement for ACCSIS Patient NavigationUH3CA244298 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CORONADO, GLORIA D, DAVIS, MELINDA MARIE · 2020 to 2023
$4.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244289NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA244298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeColonoscopy can prevent morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) and is the most commonly used screening method in the United States. Barriers to colonoscopy at multiple levels can contribute to disparities. Yet, in rural settings, little is known about who delivers colonoscopy and facilitators and barriers to colonoscopy access through screening completion.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study with providers in rural Oregon who worked in endoscopy centers or primary care clinics. Semistructured interviews, conducted in July and August, 2021, focused on clinician experiences providing colonoscopy to rural Medicaid patients, including workflows, barriers, and access. We used thematic analysis, through immersion crystallization, to analyze interview transcripts and develop emergent themes.

findingsWe interviewed 19 providers. We found two categories of colonoscopy providers: primary care providers (PCPs) doing colonoscopy on their own patients (n = 9; 47%) and general surgeons providing colonoscopy to patients referred to their services (n = 10; 53%). Providers described barriers to colonoscopy at the provider, community, and patient levels and suggested patient supports could help overcome them. Providers found current colonoscopy capacity sufficient, but noted PCPs trained to perform colonoscopy would be key to continued accessibility. Finally, providers shared concerns about the shrinking number of PCP endoscopists, especially with anticipated increased screening demand related to the CRC screening guideline shift.

conclusionsThese themes reflect opportunities to address multilevel barriers to improve access, colonoscopy capacity, and patient education approaches. Our results highlight that PCPs are an essential part of the workforce that provides colonoscopy in rural areas.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColonoscopyHumansMass ScreeningMedicaidQualitative ResearchUnited Statescolonoscopycolorectal cancer screeningendoscopyrural health

Identifiers

PMID37676061
PMCPMC10918036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.