Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37675756›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2024

Primary Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 via Infection or Vaccination Determines Mucosal Antibody-Dependent ACE2 Binding Inhibition.

Janeri Fröberg, Vera J C H Koomen, Christa E van der Gaast-de Jongh, Ria Philipsen, Corine H GeurtsvanKessel, Rory D de Vries, Marije C Baas, Renate G van der Molen, Marien I de Jonge, Luuk B Hilbrands and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janeri FröbergDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-3633
Vera J C H KoomenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.ORCID 0000-0002-3572-2236
Christa E van der Gaast-de JonghDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Ria PhilipsenRadboud Technology Center Clinical Studies, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Corine H GeurtsvanKesselDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Rory D de VriesDepartment of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam.
Marije C BaasDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Renate G van der MolenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.
Marien I de JongeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.ORCID 0000-0003-2812-5895
Luuk B HilbrandsDepartment of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.ORCID 0000-0002-4935-9765
Martijn A HuynenDepartment of Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6189-5491
Dimitri A DiavatopoulosDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen.ORCID 0000-0001-7065-7807
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMucosal antibodies play a critical role in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections or reinfections by blocking the interaction of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on the cell surface. In this study, we investigated the difference between the mucosal antibody response after primary infection and vaccination.

methodsWe assessed longitudinal changes in the quantity and capacity of nasal antibodies to neutralize the interaction of RBD with the ACE2 receptor using the spike protein and RBD from ancestral SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-Hu-1), as well as the RBD from the Delta and Omicron variants.

resultsSignificantly higher mucosal IgA concentrations were detected postinfection vs postvaccination, while vaccination induced higher IgG concentrations. However, ACE2-inhibiting activity did not differ between the cohorts. Regarding whether IgA or IgG drove ACE2 inhibition, infection-induced binding inhibition was driven by both isotypes, while postvaccination binding inhibition was mainly driven by IgG.

conclusionsOur study provides new insights into the relationship between antibody isotypes and neutralization by using a sensitive and high-throughput ACE2 binding inhibition assay. Key differences are highlighted between vaccination and infection at the mucosal level, showing that despite differences in the response quantity, postinfection and postvaccination ACE2 binding inhibition capacity did not differ.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2HumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GProtein BindingSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Immunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE2 inhibitioninfectionmucosal antibodiesSARS-CoV-2vaccination

Identifiers

PMID37675756
PMCPMC10786246
OpenAlexW4386506065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.