ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025
Optimizing preclinical models of ageing for translation to clinical trials.
Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aging and Peripheral Nerve Injuries: Impaired Repair, Inflammaging Impact, and Regeneration Resistance.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Redox biology underlying the efficacy and toxicity of colistin as a last-resort antibiotic.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- From Elixirs to Geroscience: A Historical and Molecular Perspective on Anti-Aging Medicine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Morphological features of the domestic house cricket (Acheta domesticus) for translational aging studies.GeroScience · 2025Article
- Using Computational Video Analysis in Aging Mice to Evaluate the Effects of Chronic Monotherapy, Polypharmacy, and Deprescribing Over Time.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025Article
- Optimizing preclinical models of ageing for translation to clinical trials.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Preclinical models have been the backbone of translational research for more than a century. Rats and mice are critical models in the preliminary stages of drug testing, both for determining efficacy and ruling out potential human-relevant toxicities. Historically, most preclinical pharmacological studies have used young, relatively healthy, inbred male models in highly controlled environments. In the field of geriatric pharmacology, there is a growing focus on the importance of using more appropriate preclinical models both in the testing of therapeutics commonly used in older populations, and in the evaluation of potential geroprotective drug candidates. Here we provide a commentary on optimizing preclinical models of ageing for translation to clinical trials. We will discuss approaches to modelling clinically relevant contexts such as age, sex, genetic diversity, exposures and environment, as well as measures of clinically relevant outcomes such as frailty and healthspan. We will identify the strengths and limitations of these approaches and areas for improvement. We will also briefly cover new preclinical models that move beyond rodents. We hope this commentary will be a springboard for larger discussions on optimizing preclinical ageing models for testing therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.