Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37675621›Full record

Observational studyThoracic cancer2023

Effectiveness and safety of human type 5 recombinant adenovirus (H101) in malignant tumor with malignant pleural effusion and ascites: A multicenter, observational, real-world study.

Baocheng Wang, Chen Zhong, Zijun Liao, Haitao Wang, Xiuyu Cai, Yanbing Zhang, Jun Wang, Tianxiao Wang, Hongtao Yao

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Thoracic cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Advancements inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Baocheng WangDepartment of Oncology, No. 960 Hospital of PLA, Jinan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0000-5635-5837
Chen ZhongDepartment of Oncology, No. 960 Hospital of PLA, Jinan, People's Republic of China.
Zijun LiaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China.
Haitao WangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.
Xiuyu CaiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yanbing ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China.
Jun WangDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3941-2507
Tianxiao WangHepatobiliary Pancreatic Center, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hongtao YaoDepartment of Medical Affairs, Guangdong Techpool Bio-pharma Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Fourth People’s Hospital of Jinan · CNShanxi Medical University · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CNBio-Medical Science (South Korea) · KRSecond Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CNShandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of H101 in Chinese patients with malignant pleural effusion and ascites (MPE/MA) in the real world.

methodsThis multicenter, observational, real-world study recruited patients with MPE/MA caused by malignant tumor receiving H101-containing treatment between January 2020 and June 2022. Effectiveness was evaluated by overall remission rate (ORR), and safety was evaluated based on adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analysis was performed on patients grouped according to tumor type, the volume of MPE and MA, and dosage of H101.

resultsA total of 643 eligible patients were enrolled, and 467 received H101 monotherapy and 176 received H101 combined with chemotherapy. The ORR of total patients was60.3% with 388 case of PR. In the H101 monotherapy group, the decrease of MPE or MA was achieved in 282 (60.4%, PR) patients, 176 (37.7%, NC) patients showed no change in volume of MPE or MA, and nine (1.9%, PD) patients showed an increase, yielding an ORR of 60.4% (282/467). The ORR for the combination therapy group was 60.2% (106/176), with 106 cases of PR, 69 cases of NC and one case of PD. Subgroup analyses based on tumor type, volume of MPE and MA, and dosage of H101 all showed high ORR, approximately 60%. The main AEs associated with H101-containing regimens were fever, nausea and vomiting. No serious AEs occurred in both groups.

conclusionEncouraging clinical benefits and manageable toxicity of H101 against MPE/MA were preliminarily observed in the real-world clinical setting, indicating that the H101-containing regimen is reliable, safe, and feasible, providing a novel and effective option for the treatment of this disease.

Indexed as

Adenoviruses, HumanPleural EffusionPleural Effusion, MalignantAscitesCombined Modality TherapyHumanshuman type 5 recombinant adenovirusmalignant ascitesmalignant pleural effusionmalignant serous effusionreal-world

Identifiers

PMID37675621
PMCPMC10599969
OpenAlexW4386504007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.