Trial reportStroke2023
Study of Rivaroxaban for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial Comparing Anticoagulation With Rivaroxaban to Standard-of-Care in Symptomatic Cerebral Venous Thrombosis.
Trial report in Stroke, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Multicentre, Prospective Randomized Open Label, Blinded-endpoint (PROBE) Controlled Trial of Early Anticoagulation With Rivaroxaban Versus Standard of Care in Determining Safety at 365 Days in Symptomatic Cerebral Venous Thrombosis
Treatment Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Prospective Observational Study in Vietnam
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term headache following cerebral venous thrombosis: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Pooled it
- Cerebral venous thrombosis in non-bacterial infections: a systematic review.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Different Anticoagulants in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 4,929 Patients.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Pathophysiologic Insights, Clinical Evaluation Tools, and Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prescribing patterns and clinician preferences for direct oral anticoagulant use in unusual site venous thromboembolism: a cross-sectional analysis from the Direct oral anticoagulants in Unusual Site venous Thromboembolism (DUST) study.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Observational
- Article
- Cerebral venous thrombosis: Current management, recent advances and future directions.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2025Review
- Safety and Efficacy of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.Neurology international · 2025Review
- Anticoagulant Therapy for Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis: A Propensity Score Matching Study and Inverse Probability Weighting.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Feasibility of telephone and computerized cognitive testing as a secondary outcome in an acute stroke clinical trial: A mixed methods sub-study of the AcT Trial.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis:Current Status and Challenges.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
- Article
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis: Selected Persisting Areas of Uncertainty.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology · 2025Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Unusual-Site Venous Thrombosis: An Update.Pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Presenting With Binocular Blindness and Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Cureus · 2025Article
- Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants in the Management of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis-Where Do We Stand?Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (RWCVT): A Randomized Controlled Trial in Resource-Limited Setting.Stroke research and treatment · 2025Article
- Clinico-epidemiological characteristics of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in Kenya: a retrospective case series.Frontiers in stroke · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors at 20 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmerging data suggest that direct oral anticoagulants may be a suitable choice for anticoagulation for cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). However, conducting high-quality trials in CVT is challenging as it is a rare disease with low rates of adverse outcomes such as major bleeding and functional dependence. To facilitate the design of future CVT trials, SECRET (Study of Rivaroxaban for Cerebral Venous Thrombosis) assessed (1) the feasibility of recruitment, (2) the safety of rivaroxaban compared with standard-of-care anticoagulation, and (3) patient-centered functional outcomes.
methodsThis was a phase II, prospective, open-label blinded-end point 1:1 randomized trial conducted at 12 Canadian centers. Participants were aged ≥18 years, within 14 days of a new diagnosis of symptomatic CVT, and suitable for oral anticoagulation; they were randomized to receive rivaroxaban 20 mg daily, or standard-of-care anticoagulation (warfarin, target international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0, or low-molecular-weight heparin) for 180 days, with optional extension up to 365 days. Primary outcomes were annual rate of recruitment (feasibility); and a composite of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, major extracranial hemorrhage, or mortality at 180 days (safety). Secondary outcomes included recurrent venous thromboembolism, recanalization, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding, and functional and patient-reported outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, quality of life, headache, mood, fatigue, and cognition) at days 180 and 365.
resultsFifty-five participants were randomized. The rate of recruitment was 21.3 participants/year; 57% of eligible candidates consented. Median age was 48.0 years (interquartile range, 38.5-73.2); 66% were female. There was 1 primary event (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage), 2 clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, and 1 recurrent CVT by day 180, all in the rivaroxaban group. All participants in both arms had at least partial recanalization by day 180. At enrollment, both groups on average reported reduced quality of life, low mood, fatigue, and headache with impaired cognitive performance. All metrics improved markedly by day 180.
conclusionsRecruitment targets were reached, but many eligible participants declined randomization. There were numerically more bleeding events in patients taking rivaroxaban compared with control, but rates of bleeding and recurrent venous thromboembolism were low overall and in keeping with previous studies. Participants had symptoms affecting their well-being at enrollment but improved over time. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03178864.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.