ArticleJournal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association2023
Validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the human papillomavirus knowledge scale: a methodological study.
Article in Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Knowledge About Human Papillomavirus and Vaccination Among Women Screened for Cervical Cancer.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
- Family Physicians' Knowledge Levels and Awareness Regarding HPV Infection and HPV Vaccines.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors influencing premarital risky sexual behavior likelihood and human papilloma virus knowledge among young women: A cross-sectional study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Knowledge of human papilloma virus and vaccine hesitancy among health sciences students in Türkiye.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Development and psychometric evaluation of the women's HPV prevention questionnaire based on the theory of planned behavior (W-HPV-TPBQ); a Persian version.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Peer education on HPV: impact on health sciences students' knowledge, awareness, and concern.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Evaluation of HPV Knowledge Levels Among Healthcare Professionals and Medical Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Private Hospitals and Foundation Universities in Turkey.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026Article
- The mediating role of human papillomavirus concern in the relationship between human papillomavirus knowledge and preventive behaviors against sexually transmitted diseases among Turkish women with higher education.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Knowledge and attitudes toward human papillomavirus and its vaccine among medical students.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of the Knowledge of Human Papillomavirus Scale in Japan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The relationship between human papillomavirus (HPV) knowledge and HPV vaccine acceptance among women and affecting factors in Türkiye.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to test validity and reliability of the Human Papilloma Virus Knowledge Scale (HPV-KS) in Turkish. Material and Methods: The methodological study was conducted with 920 participants at a training and research hospital in Ankara, Turkey, between February and May 2019. The data collection form consisted of descriptive characteristics of the participants and HPV-KS. Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Reported Measures were followed for the language and cultural adaptation of the scale. Content validity, exploratory, and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test the validity of the scale. The scale's reliability was assessed using the item-total correlation, Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest analysis. Results: In line with the experts' suggestions, two item were excluded from the scale. The scale content validity index was found to be 0.96. The exploratory factor analysis determined the four subscales of the scale with 33-items. The explained variance was found to be 64.56%. In the confirmatory factor analysis, all the goodness of fit indexes had acceptable values. The item-total correlations determined that each item was positively correlated with the total scale ranging from 0.53 to 0.80. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient calculated for the overall scale was 0.96. It was found that there was a statistically significant positive relationship between test and retest (r=0.166; p=0.05). Conclusion: The scale was shown to be a valid and reliable standard measurement that can be used to accurately evaluate the efficacy of health education provided by healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.