Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37675449›Full record

ArticleRestorative dentistry & endodontics2023

Tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points with rotary and reciprocating instruments.

Júlia Niero Zanatta Streck, Sabrina Arcaro, Renan Antônio Ceretta, Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi, Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia, Josiane de Almeida, Patrícia Maria Poli Kopper, Anarela Vassen Bernardi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Júlia Niero Zanatta StreckDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Extreme Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4563-1271
Sabrina ArcaroDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Extreme Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0668-7689
Renan Antônio CerettaDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Extreme Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5586-9550
Eduardo Antunes BortoluzziDepartment of Diagnosis & Oral Health, Division of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4426-9143
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti GarciaDepartment of Dentistry - Endodontics Division, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8724-0124
Josiane de AlmeidaDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Southern Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6120-5996
Patrícia Maria Poli KopperProgram in Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-6036
Anarela Vassen BernardiDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Extreme Southern Santa Catarina, Criciúma, SC, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4981-9151

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the tip and taper compatibility of accessory gutta-percha points (AGPs) with various rotary and reciprocating instruments. Materials and Methods: Using a profile analyzer, tip and taper measurements were taken of 10 AGPs of each of the 14 models available from Odous de Deus and the 4 models available from Dentsply-Maillefer. Diameter measurements were taken at 1-mm intervals, from 3 mm from the tip (D3) to 16 mm. Results: Based on the mean values obtained, 3-dimensional (3D) models of the AGPs were drawn in Autodesk Fusion 360 and superimposed on 3D models of each instrument selected (Mtwo, Reciproc, RaCe, K3, and ProDesign Logic) to determine the compatibility between the instrument and the AGP. Data corresponding to the tips and tapers of the various AGPs, as well as the tip and taper differences between the AGPs and the instruments, were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The tapers of the AGPs were subject to the American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association No. 57 standard. The Odous de Deus extra-long medium and extra-long extra-medium AGPs were shown to be compatible with Mtwo, K3, and ProDesign Logic instruments with taper 0.06 and tip sizes 25 and 30, while the Dentsply fine and fine medium cones were compatible with Mtwo, RaCe, and K3 instruments with conicity of 0.04 and tip sizes 35 and 40. Conclusions: Both the Odous de Deus and Dentsply commercial brands included 2 AGP models with tip (D3) and taper compatibility with Mtwo, RaCe, K3, and/or Prodesign Logic instruments.

Indexed as

Dental equipmentDimensional measurement accuracyEndodontic obturationEndodonticsGutta-percha

Identifiers

PMID37675449
PMCPMC10477427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.