Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37675400›Full record

ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2023

PROTOCOL: The impact of infrastructure on low income consumers' nutritious diet, women's economic empowerment, and gender equality in low-and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map.

Gloria Adobea Odei Obeng-Amoako, Clarice Panyin Nyan, Joseph Clottey, Sheila Agyemang Oppong, Edward Kusi Asafo-Agyei, Pacem Kotchofa, Charles Yaw Okyere, Solomon Zena Walelign, Takyiwaa Manuh, David Sarfo Ameyaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gloria Adobea Odei Obeng-AmoakoInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5004-3701
Clarice Panyin NyanInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.
Joseph ClotteyInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4317-1630
Sheila Agyemang OppongInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.
Edward Kusi Asafo-AgyeiInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.
Pacem KotchofaInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.
Charles Yaw OkyereInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-7001
Solomon Zena WalelignInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8408-6005
Takyiwaa ManuhInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.
David Sarfo AmeyawInternational Centre for Evaluation and Development Tema Accra Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This is the protocol for an evidence and gap map. The objectives are as follows: this evidence and gap map (EGM) aims to identify, map, and provide an overview of the existing evidence and gaps on the impact of different types of physical infrastructure on various outcomes of low-income consumers' nutritious diet, women's economic empowerment, and gender equality in low- and middle-income countries. The specific objectives of the EGM are: (1) identify clusters of evidence that offer opportunities for evidence synthesis and (2) identify gaps in evidence where new studies, research, and evaluations are needed.

Identifiers

PMID37675400
PMCPMC10477950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.