ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2023
Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: a comprehensive review and case series.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing Latissimus Dorsi Flap to Implant in Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Outcomes of Chest Wall Perforator Flaps for Partial Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Experience.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Beyond the Classic Latissimus Dorsi Flap: A Decision-Making Algorithm for Technique Selection in Complex Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Current Role of Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap in Breast Reconstruction: Review and Case Reports.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Options After Abdominoplasty: Lumbar Artery Perforator Versus Profunda Artery Perforator.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Muscular Versus Myo-cutaneous Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Delayed Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Postoperative Outcomes.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- [Clinical effects of free latissimus dorsi muscle flap harvested through small incision under the assistance of endoscopy in repairing deep wounds in limbs].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Observational
- Chest Wall Perforator Flaps in Partial Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Using a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) Flap: Clinical and Medico-Legal Insights From a Four-Year Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Implant Exchange and Latissimus Dorsi Flap Replacement After Breast Implant Complications.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Monitoring lymphatic reconstitution in free latissimus dorsi flap for lower extremity defects repair in pediatric patients: a case series.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
- A Meta-analysis Comparing Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flaps and Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Review
- Latissimus Dorsi Musculocutaneous Flap as a Therapeutic Option in Breast Reconstructive Surgery: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) has gained popularity given its versatile nature and broad applicability in breast reconstruction. Its resurgence has been attributed to its ability to be enhanced using implant or high-volume fat grafting, rendering it a primary option for selected patients. The aim of this review is to tackle current indications and subjects of controversy regarding use of complete-autologous and implant-enhanced LDF in breast reconstruction. Also, a case-series showcasing the authors' experience with this versatile reconstructive option is presented. A search across Web of Science and PubMed MEDLINE from inception through January 3, 2023, was conducted. Articles reporting postoperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction with LDF were included. Regarding the case series, electronic medical records of patients who underwent total mastectomy and autologous breast reconstruction with LDF from January 2011 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Data on demographic and oncologic characteristics, and surgical characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Our review suggests that LDF is suitable for patients who lack alternative donor site, have a history of abdominoplasty or no access to microsurgery, smokers or obese. Latissimus dorsi (LD) harvesting has almost complete shoulder function recovery in the long-term. Thoracodorsal nerve division does not cause volume loss or animation deformity. Multisite multilayer fat grafting, beveling the edges of the skin paddle and fat, folding the LD muscle and plicating the paddle allow adequate projection and contour achievement. Our case-series included 234 reconstructions. Almost half of the patients had immediate fat transfer during reconstruction (51.3%). The rate of recipient site hematoma was 3.0%, seroma was 7.7%, wound disruption 32.1%, wound disruption events requiring unplanned procedures was 13.7%, and surgical site infection (SSI) was 12.4%. The LDF is reliable and safe for immediate or delayed breast reconstruction or salvage after reconstruction failure. Its versatility, reliable anatomy, easy dissection, and relative low complication rate have revived this modality as valuable opportunity for breast reconstruction in this era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.