ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2023
Artificial intelligence in esophageal cancer diagnosis and treatment: where are we now?-a narrative review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Future prospects of deep learning in esophageal cancer diagnosis and clinical decision support (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Computer-aided diagnostic system with automated deep learning method based on the AutoGluon framework improved the diagnostic accuracy of early esophageal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Learner-Centered Experience-Based Medical Education in an AI-Driven Society: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) use is becoming increasingly prevalent directly or indirectly in daily clinical practice, including esophageal cancer (EC) diagnosis and treatment. Although the limits of its adoption and their clinical benefits are still unknown, any physician related to EC patients' management should be aware of the status and future perspectives of AI use in their field. The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing literature regarding the role of AI in diagnosis and treatment of EC. We have focused on the aids AI entails in the management of this pathology and we have tried to offer an updated perspective to maximize current applications and to identify potential future uses of it. Methods: Data concerning AI applied to EC diagnosis and treatment is not limited, including direct (those specifically related to them) and indirect (those referring to other specialties as radiology or pathology), applications. However, the clinical relevance of the discussed and presented models is still unknown. We performed a research in PubMed of English and Spanish written studies from January 1970 to June 2022. Key Content and Findings: Information regarding the role of AI in EC diagnosis and treatment has increased exponentially in recent years. Several models, including different variables and features have been investigated and some of them internally and externally validated. However, the main challenge remains to apply and introduce all these data into clinical practice, and, as some of the discussed studies argue, if the models are able to enhance experienced endoscopists' judgement. Although AI use is increasing steadily in different medical specialties, the truth is, most of the time, the gap between model development and clinical implementation is not closed. Learning to understand the routinely application of AI, as well as future improvements, would lead to a broadened adoption. Conclusions: Physicians should be aware of the multiple current clinical uses of AI in EC diagnosis and treatment and should take part in their clinical application and future developments to enhance patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.