Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37675312›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2023

The clinical significance and application of the peri-implant phenotype in dental implant surgery: a narrative review.

Ziyi Liu, Cong Li, Yushan Liu, Jincheng Zeng, Hongxing Chu, Pei Chen, Tengfei Zhou, Wuwei Yin, Mingdeng Rong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziyi LiuDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Cong LiDepartment of Stomatology, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Yushan LiuDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jincheng ZengDepartment of Stomatology, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Dongguan, China.
Hongxing ChuDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Pei ChenDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tengfei ZhouDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wuwei YinDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mingdeng RongDepartment of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, Stomatological Hospital, School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: In recent years, the concept of the peri-implant phenotype has become a new standard for the clinical evaluation of the soft and hard tissues surrounding dental implants. Improving this phenotype enhances the likelihood of achieving long-term favorable results and is a necessary consideration during implant planning. Stable peri-implant tissue support is also crucial for the functional and aesthetic value of implant restoration. Herein, the authors review the clinical significance of the peri-implant phenotype and assess the timing of treatment strategies for improving peri-implant phenotype elements. Methods: A literature search was performed to retrieve papers on peri-implant tissue management and clinical outcomes published up to November 24th, 2022 in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Scopus. Key Content and Findings: The optimal time to improve peri-implant bone thickness (PBT) is with augmentation procedures before implant surgery or at the same time as first-stage surgery. Similarly, issues associated with keratinized mucosa width (KMW) and mucosal thickness (MT) should be addressed before final restoration. The establishment of supracrestal tissue height (STH) depends on the MT and implant depth of the patient. Furthermore, special attention should be paid to the effect of the peri-implant phenotype on the prognosis of immediate implant placement in the aesthetic zone. Conclusions: The long-term success of implant restoration depends on careful planning that considers appropriate interventions for improving the peri-implant phenotype at different stages of treatment to reduce iatrogenic variables.

Indexed as

implant restorationPeri-implant phenotypesurgical procedurestimingtissue grafts

Identifiers

PMID37675312
PMCPMC10477659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.