ArticleJournal of family & community medicine
Outcomes of home-isolated coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Bahrain.
Article in Journal of family & community medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Erratum: Outcomes of home-isolated coronavirus disease 2019 patients in Bahrain.Journal of family & community medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a huge burden on healthcare systems and necessitated a risk assessment of patients and an update of the treatment protocol to include home isolation for low-risk patients. The primary objective was to describe the outcome of home isolation and the characteristics of patients at higher risk of admission. The secondary objectives were to determine the proportion of patients with pneumonia and hypoxemia and the correlation between cycle of the threshold (CT) value and severity of the disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsFor this study, 394 patients were randomly selected from a total of 8000 home-isolated COVID-19 patients during July to October 2020, and were followed by Bahrain International Hospital (BIH). All data were obtained from a live Excel sheet completed by physicians covering BIH during the study period. Data analysis included Chi-square test to determine significant association between categorical variable, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression analysis.
resultsOf the 394 home-isolated patients followed, 18 patients with missing data were excluded. The overall admission rate was 50% for ≥50 age group compared to 13.3% for 18-49 age group, while only 2.8% in <18 age group. Moreover, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions were significantly higher in the older age group: 15.2% for ≥50 age group (P < 0.001). About 14% of the patients with comorbidities needed ICU admission, compared with 1.8% of those without comorbidities (
conclusionHome isolation of low-risk patients with monitoring and follow-up was a safe and necessary step in dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.