Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37675174›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medicine and life2023

Enhancing skill conceptualization, critical thinking, and nursing knowledge through reflective case discussions: a systematic review.

Haeril Amir, Pande Ayu Naya Kasih Permatananda, Desy Dwi Cahyani, Wahyuny Langelo, Rosita Rosita, Sajodin Sajodin, Richa Noprianty, Anggia Astuti, Suhari Suhari, Sri Wahyuningsih and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medicine and life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Decision support strategies for bedside nursing clinical reasoning: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Haeril AmirFaculty of Public Health, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar, Indonesia.
Pande Ayu Naya Kasih PermatanandaFaculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universitas Warmadewa, Bali, Indonesia.
Desy Dwi CahyaniMidwifery Department, Poltekkes Kemenkes Malang, Malang, Indonesia.
Wahyuny LangeloUniversitas Katolik De La Salle, Manado, Indonesia.
Rosita RositaNursing Study Program, Akademi Keperawatan Justitia, Palu, Indonesia.
Sajodin SajodinFaculty of Health Science, Universitas Aisyiyah Bandung, Bandung, Indonesia.
Richa NopriantyBachelor of Applied Nursing Anesthesiology, Bhakti Kencana University, Bandung, Indonesia.
Anggia AstutiFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia.
Suhari SuhariFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia.
Sri WahyuningsihFaculty of Nursing, Universitas Jember, Jember, Indonesia.
Prima Dewi KusumawatiFaculty of Nursing, Institut Ilmu Kesehatan Strada Indonesia, Kediri, Indonesia.
Prita Dhyani SwamilaksitaFaculty of Health Science, Universitas Esa Unggul, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sudarman SudarmanFaculty of Public Health, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Makassar, Indonesia.
Syaiful SyaifulUniversitas Megarezky, Makassar, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reflective case discussion (RCD) is a reflective activity conducted by nurses, midwives, and other healthcare workers to enhance their skills, critical thinking, and knowledge. This systematic review follows the PRISMA Guideline checklist and includes articles from various databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. The quality assessment of each article was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). During the initial database search, we retrieved 997 articles from Scopus, 700 articles from ProQuest, 357,554 articles from PubMed, and 1,526 articles from ScienceDirect. The search was conducted using relevant keywords, including "reflective case discussion," "nursing," "critical thinking," "skills," and "knowledge." Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight relevant articles were identified, excluding duplicate studies, limited to full papers, open access, conducted in a hospital setting, and written in English. The findings demonstrate that RCD effectively enhances nurses' skills, critical thinking, and knowledge, contributing to their professionalism in patient care. RCD also proved beneficial in preventing repetitive mistakes and promoting teamwork among nurses. Thus, RCD should be embraced as a valuable form of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and integrated into nurses' ongoing learning processes.

Indexed as

Concept FormationThinkingHealth PersonnelHospitalsHumansLearningnurseprofessionalreflective case discussion (RCD)systematic review

Identifiers

PMID37675174
PMCPMC10478664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.