Trial reportJournal of medicine and life2023
Assessing the efficacy and safety of Sildenafil
Trial report in Journal of medicine and life, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive value and clinical treatment guidance of uterine artery blood flow parameters for recurrent pregnancy loss.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Observational
- Burden, causes, and treatment approaches of recurrent pregnancy loss: a scoping review.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial thickness and uterine blood flow influence pregnancy continuation until term. Nifedipine, a type II calcium channel blocker, and Sildenafil, a type 5-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, have shown the potential to improve these factors. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of Nifedipine and Sildenafil in improving endometrial blood flow and thickness in Iraqi women with recurrent first-trimester miscarriages. Women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss in the first trimester (non-pregnant during the study) were randomly assigned to two groups. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound assessed uterine artery pulsatility, resistance indexes, and endometrial thickness during the second phase of the menstrual cycle (day 15 to day 25). The first group received oral Nifedipine (10 mg) twice daily, while the second group received oral Sildenafil citrate (20 mg) every 8 hours from day 5 to day 25. Baseline measurements showed no significant differences in pulsatility index between the groups (2.02±0.52 for Nifedipine, 2.03±0.49 for Sildenafil, p=0.927). Sildenafil treatment resulted in a more noticeable reduction in the pulsatility index. The resistive index had a significant difference in baseline readings (0.98±0.14 for Nifedipine, 1.06±0.14 for Sildenafil, p=0.033), with Sildenafil showing a more pronounced reduction. Post-treatment, Sildenafil demonstrated a greater improvement in endometrial thickness than Nifedipine (10.09±0.74 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.