ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2023
Opportunistic screening at chest computed tomography: literature review of cardiovascular significance of incidental findings.
Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Thoracic Aorta Calcification and Risk of All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2026Pooled it
- What can we learn about bone density in COPD patients from a chest CT? A systematic review.Croatian medical journal · 2024Pooled it
- Improved Cardiac Function and Glycemic Control in Elderly Diabetic Patients Through Structured Case Management After CABG.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Automatic phenotyping of emergency department patients with incidental hepatic steatosis: A machine learning clustering analysis.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Calculation of Ejection Fraction Using Cardiac Computed Tomography: Clinical Evolution, Reliability, and Technological Challenges-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Coronary artery calcification is associated with reduced survival in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in the MaastrICCht cohort.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Coronary Calcium Scoring in Diabetes: Recalibrating Cardiovascular Risk in 2025.Journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Reduced order computational fluid dynamic simulations in the thoracic aorta are associated with disease recorded in a medical biobank.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Thoracic aortic calcification as a predictor of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Several incidental cardiovascular findings are present in a routine chest computed tomography (CT) scan, many of which do not make it to the final radiology report. However, these findings have important clinical implications, particularly providing prognosis and risk-stratification for future cardiovascular events. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on these incidental cardiovascular findings in a routine chest CT and inform the radiologist on their clinical relevance. Methods: A time unlimited review of PubMed and Web of Science was performed by using relevant keywords. Articles in English that involved adults were included. Key Content and Findings: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is the most common incidental cardiac finding detected in a routine chest CT and is a significant predictor of cardiovascular events. Noncoronary vascular calcifications in chest CT include aortic valve, mitral annulus, and thoracic aortic calcifications (TAC). Among these, aortic valve calcification (AVC) has the strongest association with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events. Additional cardiac findings such as myocardial scar and left ventricular size and noncardiac findings such as thoracic fat, bone density, hepatic steatosis, and breast artery calcifications can also help in risk stratification and patient management. Conclusions: The radiologist interpreting a routine chest CT should be cognizant of the incidental cardiovascular findings, which helps in the diagnosis and risk-stratification of cardiovascular disease. This will guide appropriate referral and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.