Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37675086›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular diagnosis and therapy2023

Opportunistic screening at chest computed tomography: literature review of cardiovascular significance of incidental findings.

Arzu Canan, Abed Al-Hamid Ghandour, Sachin S Saboo, Prabhakar Shantha Rajiah

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Improved Cardiac Function and Glycemic Control in Elderly Diabetic Patients Through Structured Case Management After CABG.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Arzu CananDepartment of Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Abed Al-Hamid GhandourDepartment of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Akron General Hospital, Akron, OH, USA.
Sachin S SabooSouth Texas Radiology Group, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Prabhakar Shantha RajiahDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USRadiology Associates · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Several incidental cardiovascular findings are present in a routine chest computed tomography (CT) scan, many of which do not make it to the final radiology report. However, these findings have important clinical implications, particularly providing prognosis and risk-stratification for future cardiovascular events. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on these incidental cardiovascular findings in a routine chest CT and inform the radiologist on their clinical relevance. Methods: A time unlimited review of PubMed and Web of Science was performed by using relevant keywords. Articles in English that involved adults were included. Key Content and Findings: Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is the most common incidental cardiac finding detected in a routine chest CT and is a significant predictor of cardiovascular events. Noncoronary vascular calcifications in chest CT include aortic valve, mitral annulus, and thoracic aortic calcifications (TAC). Among these, aortic valve calcification (AVC) has the strongest association with coronary artery disease and cardiovascular events. Additional cardiac findings such as myocardial scar and left ventricular size and noncardiac findings such as thoracic fat, bone density, hepatic steatosis, and breast artery calcifications can also help in risk stratification and patient management. Conclusions: The radiologist interpreting a routine chest CT should be cognizant of the incidental cardiovascular findings, which helps in the diagnosis and risk-stratification of cardiovascular disease. This will guide appropriate referral and management.

Indexed as

cardiaccardiovascularChest computed tomography (CT)incidental

Identifiers

PMID37675086
PMCPMC10478026
OpenAlexW4386139276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.