Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674942›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

A Systematic Review: Do the Use of Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Artificial Intelligence Improve Patient Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Ischemia Compared to Clinician-Only Approaches?

Binay K Panjiyar, Gershon Davydov, Hiba Nashat, Sally Ghali, Shadin Afifi, Vineet Suryadevara, Yaman Habab, Alana Hutcheson, Ana P Arcia Franchini

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Binay K PanjiyarInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Gershon DavydovInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Hiba NashatInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Sally GhaliInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Shadin AfifiInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Vineet SuryadevaraInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Yaman HababInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Alana HutchesonInternal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Ana P Arcia FranchiniPsychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences and Psychology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) present a significant global health challenge and remain a primary cause of death. Early detection and intervention are crucial for improved outcomes in acute coronary syndrome (ACS), particularly acute myocardial infarction (AMI) cases. Artificial intelligence (AI) can detect heart disease early by analyzing patient information and electrocardiogram (ECG) data, providing invaluable insights into this critical health issue. However, the imbalanced nature of ECG and patient data presents challenges for traditional machine learning (ML) algorithms in performing unbiasedly. Investigators have proposed various data-level and algorithm-level solutions to overcome these challenges. In this study, we used a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to give an overview of the current literature and to highlight the difficulties of utilizing ML, deep learning (DL), and AI algorithms in predicting, diagnosing, and prognosis of heart diseases. We reviewed 181 articles from reputable journals published between 2013 and June 15, 2023, focusing on eight selected papers for in-depth analysis. The analysis considered factors such as heart disease type, algorithms used, applications, and proposed solutions and compared the benefits of algorithms combined with clinicians versus clinicians alone. This systematic review revealed that the current ML-based diagnostic approaches face several open problems and issues when implementing ML, DL, and AI in real-life settings. Although these algorithms show higher sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies in detecting heart disease, we must address the ethical concerns while implementing these models into clinical practice. The transparency of how these algorithms operate remains a challenge. Nevertheless, further exploration and research in ML, DL, and AI are necessary to overcome these challenges and fully harness their potential to improve health outcomes for patients with AMI.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromeacute myocardial infarcacute st-elevation myocardial infarctionai and machine learningai in cardiologyatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseasecardiac markersdeep learning artificial intelligenceheart attackinterventional cardiology

Identifiers

PMID37674942
PMCPMC10478604
OpenAlexW4385605271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.