Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674931›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2023

The shift in COVID-19 vaccination policy for pregnant women, from restricted to required, and the confusion that ensued.

Kamil Mosa Fram, Shawqi Saleh, Rand Fram, Taiba Khalaf, Shrouq Almasoud, Bader Almukaimi, Sondos Tawasfshy Tawasfshy, May Aladrah, Majd Kharabsheh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kamil Mosa FramDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
Shawqi SalehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
Rand FramDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
Taiba KhalafDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
Shrouq AlmasoudDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
Bader AlmukaimiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
Sondos Tawasfshy TawasfshyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
May AladrahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
Majd KharabshehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Jordan, Amman-Jordan.
University of Jordan · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The aim was to investigate the response of pregnant women when the COVID-19 vaccination policy shifted from restricted to required, and the confusion that ensued during pregnancy, bearing in mind that women undergo unique physiological and immunological changes during pregnancy, making them at risk of developing a more severe course of COVID-19 infection compared to their non-pregnant peers. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out at the outpatient clinics at Jordan University Hospital for all pregnant women during the period of the survey from 1 Results: In total, 468 pregnant women were interviewed. The single primary source of information about the COVID-19 vaccine was the traditional media, audio-visual and print media being the most important as reported by 191 women (40.81%), while possible harm to the fetus was the single main reason for refusal of vaccination during pregnancy as reported by 111 women (23.72%). Conclusions: Reluctance toward vaccination is primarily driven by the fierce media campaign that portrayed its initially ambiguous effects on the pregnancy and fetus in a negative light, in conjunction with the open media platforms that enabled semi-experts to issue medically inaccurate statements and information and further complicated the matter by planting the seed of fear and mistrust of the public in the health care system and providers. More public healthcare awareness regarding the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine is needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19safety in pregnancyside effectssocial mediavaccination refusal

Identifiers

PMID37674931
PMCPMC10477761
OpenAlexW4380484647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.