ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2023
The burden of paraovarian cysts - a case series and review of the literature.
Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Dilemma of a Giant Paratubal Cyst in an Adolescent Female Mimicking a Mesenteric Cyst: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Isolated fallopian tube torsion associated with a paraovarian cyst.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Coexistence of gynecological pathology with endometriosis and adenomyosis.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Giant Paraovarian Cysts in an Adolescent Female Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A paraovarian cyst (POC) is a cyst in the broad ligament or mesosalpinx. Paraovarian cysts have an estimated prevalence of 5-20% amongst the adnexal masses. Despite the high prevalence and availability of advanced imaging modalities, an accurate pre-operative diagnosis of POC is still made in less than 50% of patients. Case reports: Two females with suspected ovarian torsion underwent laparotomy and had POCs. A 42-year-old hysterectomized female underwent surgery for a suspected POC which turned out to be a mesenteric cyst. Two females underwent laparotomy for suspected mesenteric cysts which turned out to be POCs. A nulliparous female with infertility conceived spontaneously after cystectomy of POC. Results: Optimal management of an adnexal mass depends on the knowledge of the origin and the exact nature of the mass. No clear-cut guidelines exist for the management of POCs despite their high prevalence. There is a need for further research on this topic to formulate clear-cut guidelines for their management. Conclusions: Radiologists and gynaecologists need to keep them in mind as differentials for patients with adnexal masses to ensure a correct pre-operative diagnosis in order to achieve an optimal outcome for these females. Gynaecologists need to be aware of the cases which can be managed conservatively and those that need surgery, along with the extent of the surgery required, taking care to protect the ovary at all costs, particularly in benign cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.