ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2023
Bacterial single-cell transcriptomics: Recent technical advances and future applications in dentistry.
Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of Ultrasonic-Assisted Extraction, Structural Characterization, and Bioactivities of Polysaccharides fromAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Empowering fungal infection research with single-cell RNA sequencing.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota and tuberculosis.iMeta · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics perspectives on transcriptomics: A comprehensive review of bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Single-cell RNA sequencing using split-pool barcoding reveals transcriptional heterogeneity inJournal of oral microbiology · 2025Article
- Single cell genomics based insights into the impact of cell-type specific microbial internalization on disease severity.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomics and metatranscriptomics have enhanced our understanding of the oral microbiome and its impact on oral health. However, these approaches have inherent limitations in exploring individual cells and the heterogeneity within mixed microbial communities, which restricts our current understanding to bulk cells and species-level information. Fortunately, recent technical advances have enabled the application of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) for studying bacteria, shedding light on cell-to-cell diversity and interactions between host-bacterial cells at the single-cell level. Here, we address the technical barriers in capturing RNA from single bacterial cells and highlight pioneering studies from the past decade. We also discuss recent achievements in host-bacterial dual transcriptional profiling at the single-cell level. Bacterial scRNA-seq provides advantages in various research fields, including the investigation of phenotypic heterogeneity within genetically identical bacteria, identification of rare cell types, detection of antibiotic-resistant or persistent cells, analysis of individual gene expression patterns and metabolic activities, and characterization of specific microbe-host interactions. Integrating single-cell techniques with bulk approaches is essential to gain a comprehensive understanding of oral diseases and develop targeted and personalized treatment in dentistry. The reviewed pioneering studies are expected to inspire future research on the oral microbiome at the single-cell level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.