Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674812›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2023

Prognostic Implication of

Anneloes L Noordhof, Esther M Swart, Ronald A M Damhuis, Lizza E L Hendriks, Peter W A Kunst, Mieke J Aarts, Wouter H van Geffen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. KRAS mutation subtypes in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Article
  8. Real-World Evidence Study of Patients withCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Editorial:Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anneloes L NoordhofDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Esther M SwartDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ronald A M DamhuisDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lizza E L HendriksDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Peter W A KunstDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mieke J AartsDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter H van GeffenDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NLMaastricht University · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: With the approval of G12C inhibitors as the second line of treatment for Methods: This nationwide population-based study used real-world data from The Netherlands Cancer Registry. We selected patients with stage IV Results: From 28,120 registered patients with lung cancer, 1185 were selected with a Conclusions: There was no influence of

Indexed as

(Chemo-)immunotherapyKirsten rat sarcomaKRAS G12CNon–small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID37674812
PMCPMC10477684
OpenAlexW4382358152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.