Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674800›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2023

Comparison of the efficacy of oxygen-ozone and lidocaine injections in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.

Nurdan Korkmaz, Merve Örücü Atar, Sinem Uyar Köylü, Sefa Gümrük Aslan, Özge Tezen, Serdar Kesikburun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Oxygen-Ozone Therapy of Musculoskeletal Neck Pain: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Nurdan KorkmazDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences University, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-9538-1453
Merve Örücü AtarDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences University, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6439-8818
Sinem Uyar KöylüDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences University, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-8776
Sefa Gümrük AslanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences University, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-9627
Özge TezenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-2934-0423
Serdar KesikburunDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Health Sciences University, Gülhane School of Medicine, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9400-4683
Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare effectiveness of oxygen-ozone injection versus lidocaine injection on the trigger point in the treatment of myofascial pain syndrome (MPS). Patients and methods: Between April 2021 and December 2021, a total of 46 patients with MPS (8 males, 38 females; mean age: 44.7±10.4 years; range, 25 to 65 years) were included. The patients were randomized to either ozone injection (n=23) or lidocaine injection (n=23) groups. All injections were administered once a week for three consecutive weeks. The primary outcome measure was the pain severity assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcome measures were cervical lateral flexion range of motion (ROM), pain score (PS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). The measurements were performed before the treatment, and at four and 12 weeks after treatment. Results: There was a significant effect of time for VAS, PS, and NDI scores in both groups. Compared to baseline versus Weeks 4 and 12, the VAS, PS, and NDI scores significantly decreased over time in both groups (p<0.001 for all). A significant group X time interaction was identified regarding the VAS scores. The mean difference in the VAS scores over time was significantly higher in the lidocaine group compared to the oxygen-ozone group (p=0.028). Conclusion: Oxygen-ozone and lidocaine injections of the trigger point can effectively improve pain and functional status. However, lidocaine injection appears to be superior in reducing pain compared to oxygen-ozone injection, but is not superior in improving function and PS.

Indexed as

Functionlidocaine injectionmyofascial pain syndromeoxygen-ozone injection.

Identifiers

PMID37674800
PMCPMC10478539
OpenAlexW4385650348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.