Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674797›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2023

Developing a common metric using current scales for assessing functioning in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Pervin Demir, Ayşe Adile Küçükdeveci, Şehim Kutlay, Atilla Halil Elhan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pervin DemirDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6652-0290
Ayşe Adile KüçükdeveciDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-7255-7535
Şehim KutlayDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-6869-6070
Atilla Halil ElhanDepartment of Biostatistics, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-3324-248X
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Various scales exist to assess different domains of functioning in knee osteoarthritis (OA). This study aimed to explore whether it is possible to develop a common metric (CM) from the frequently used scales to assess functioning in knee OA. Patients and methods: The methodological study evaluated 411 patients (81 males, 330 females; mean age: 61.8±10.5 years; range, 41 to 88 years) with knee OA. Data from the Health Assessment Questionnaire, Oxford Knee Score, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and the Nottingham Health Profile were used, and the items focusing on self-care, mobility, and domestic activity domains based on the activities and participation component of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health were included. Concurrent calibration was performed to combine the items of the scales. The CM parameters were estimated using the Rasch measurement model. Reliability was assessed using the person separation index. The CM was utilized to generate a transformation table to convert the scale scores to each other based on the reference metric score. Results: Each scale fitted the Rasch model. Item invariance was achieved for the CM (p=0.775). The CM had a person separation index of 0.827. Age, sex, and disease duration did not cause difference in item functions. The CM satisfied the assumptions of unidimensionality and local independence. Conclusion: A reliable CM was created from the commonly used scales to measure functioning in individuals with knee OA. Thus, clinicians and researchers can refer to the transformation table to directly compare scores of those scales and use them interchangeably.

Indexed as

Common metricconcurrent calibrationfunctioningknee osteoarthritisRasch model.

Identifiers

PMID37674797
PMCPMC10478544
OpenAlexW4385650288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.