Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674785›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2023

Sleep duration and age-related macular degeneration: a cross-sectional and Mendelian randomization study.

Shizhen Lei, Zhouyang Liu, Haihui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New Perspective on Aqueous Humor Circulation: Retina Takes the Lead.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Circadian Preference.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shizhen LeiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Zhouyang LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Haihui LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yan'an People's Hospital, Yan'an, Shaanxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the association between sleep duration and age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Design: Cross-sectional study, bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR). For cross-sectional analysis, we used survey data of 5,481 participants aged ≥40 years from the 2005 to 2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). For MR analysis, we used sleep- and AMD-associated genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data involving large populations. Methods: The association between sleep duration and AMD was assessed using logistic regression models. For MR analysis, the primary approach for MR analysis was the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method. Results: In cross-sectional analysis, after adjusting for multiple covariates, short sleep duration (SSD) was found to be associated with increased risk of early AMD [odds ratio (OR) = 1.364, Conclusion: Our findings provide the evidence supporting the association between sleep deficiency and higher risk of AMD. Further studies are required to confirm our findings and elucidate the mechanisms underlying this association.

Indexed as

age-related macular degenerationcausal effectcross-sectional studyMendelian randomizationsleep

Identifiers

PMID37674785
PMCPMC10477604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.