ArticleResearch square2023
Top-down mass spectrometry of native proteoforms and their complexes: A community study.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The combination of native electrospray ionisation with top-down fragmentation in mass spectrometry allows simultaneous determination of the stoichiometry of noncovalent complexes and identification of their component proteoforms and co-factors. While this approach is powerful, both native mass spectrometry and top-down mass spectrometry are not yet well standardised, and only a limited number of laboratories regularly carry out this type of research. To address this challenge, the Consortium for Top-Down Proteomics (CTDP) initiated a study to develop and test protocols for native mass spectrometry combined with top-down fragmentation of proteins and protein complexes across eleven instruments in nine laboratories. The outcomes are summarised in this report to provide robust benchmarks and a valuable entry point for the scientific community.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.