ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2023
Evaluating the Methodological Approaches of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviours Questionnaire into Portuguese.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Portuguese Version of the MISSCARE Survey-Patient: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Implementation of a PEWS-integrated electronic SBAR handover model for pediatric inpatients: A nonconcurrent controlled study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Reply to Cangelosi, G. Comment on "Inácio et al. Nursing Practice Environment in the Armed Forces: Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Enhancing Teamwork and Patient Safety Through TeamSTEPPSNursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Review
- Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the TeamSTEPPSNursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Patient Participation During Nursing Bedside Handover: A State-of-the-Art Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Nursing Practice Environment in the Armed Forces: Scoping Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
- Authentic Leadership of Nurses in the Hospital: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Translation and Validation for the Portuguese Population of the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviors Questionnaire.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Cross-Cultural Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Quality of Oncology Nursing Care Scale.Cancers · 2024Article
- Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of the Portuguese Transcultural Nursing Leadership Questionnaire (QLTE-PT).Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Methodological Approaches of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviours Questionnaire into Portuguese.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nurse managers need culturally adapted assessment instruments to support the implementation of change to Nursing Bedside Handover (NBH) in healthcare institutions. This study aimed to cross-culturally adapt the Bedside Handover Attitudes and Behaviours (BHAB) questionnaire to the Portuguese context and evaluate the methodological approaches used for this purpose. To guide this study, we followed a guideline for cross-cultural translation and adaptation measurement instruments in healthcare. The results of the content validity testing suggested that the BHAB questionnaire is a valid instrument for use in the Portuguese context. To obtain these results we showed 1) using of a new methodological approach, the dual focus, to resolve the divergences and ambiguities in the translators' committee and the multi-professional committee; 2) the lack of a conceptual definition of the construct of the instrument as a requirement to retain items with I-CVI <0.70 after validity relevance pretesting and 3) the cognitive debriefing and relevance pretesting as methodological approaches which can be used alone or together to reinforce the evaluation of cultural relevance of the items. We concluded there is a need for guidelines to support the decision-making process of healthcare researchers with comprehensive information about the different methodological approaches they can follow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.