ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2023
LOGICS: Learning optimal generative distribution for designing de novo chemical structures.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- ReLink-PyB: an adapted REINVENT-based framework for non-DSM PfDHODH inhibitor discovery.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Novel molecular design via a scaffold-aware transformer with multi-scale attention mechanisms.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Interpretable and Scalable Similarity Metrics for DNA-Encoded Library Design Using Generative Topographic Mapping.Molecular informatics · 2026Article
- RL-MSVP: Reinforcement Learning and Multi-scale Validation Pipeline Investigating Azole-Fused Pyrimidines as PotentialACS omega · 2025Article
- AI-guided discovery and optimization of antimicrobial peptides through species-aware language model.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A genotype-to-drug diffusion model for generation of tailored anti-cancer small molecules.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, the field of computational drug design has made significant strides in the development of artificial intelligence (AI) models for the generation of de novo chemical compounds with desired properties and biological activities, such as enhanced binding affinity to target proteins. These high-affinity compounds have the potential to be developed into more potent therapeutics for a broad spectrum of diseases. Due to the lack of data required for the training of deep generative models, however, some of these approaches have fine-tuned their molecular generators using data obtained from a separate predictor. While these studies show that generative models can produce structures with the desired target properties, it remains unclear whether the diversity of the generated structures and the span of their chemical space align with the distribution of the intended target molecules. In this study, we present a novel generative framework, LOGICS, a framework for Learning Optimal Generative distribution Iteratively for designing target-focused Chemical Structures. We address the exploration-exploitation dilemma, which weighs the choice between exploring new options and exploiting current knowledge. To tackle this issue, we incorporate experience memory and employ a layered tournament selection approach to refine the fine-tuning process. The proposed method was applied to the binding affinity optimization of two target proteins of different protein classes, κ-opioid receptors, and PIK3CA, and the quality and the distribution of the generative molecules were evaluated. The results showed that LOGICS outperforms competing state-of-the-art models and generates more diverse de novo chemical structures with optimized properties. The source code is available at the GitHub repository ( https://github.com/GIST-CSBL/LOGICS ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.