Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674168›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2023

Detection of diabetic patients in people with normal fasting glucose using machine learning.

Kun Lv, Chunmei Cui, Rui Fan, Xiaojuan Zha, Pengyu Wang, Jun Zhang, Lina Zhang, Jing Ke, Dong Zhao, Qinghua Cui and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predicting surgical intervention in paediatric cervical abscesses using machine learning: a comparative analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kun Lv *Key Laboratory of Non-Coding RNA Transformation Research of Anhui Higher Education Institutes, Wuhu, China. lvkun315@126.com.
Chunmei Cui *Department of Biomedical Informatics, State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China. ccm328@bjmu.edu.cn.
Rui Fan *Department of Biomedical Informatics, State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojuan ZhaLaboratory Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, People's Republic of China.
Pengyu WangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhangMedical College of Shihezi University, Shihezi, People's Republic of China.
Lina ZhangDepartment of Laboratory Diagnosis, Daqing Oil Field General Hospital, Daqing, People's Republic of China.
Jing KeBeijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Center for Endocrine Metabolism and Immune Diseases, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Dong ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Diabetes Research and Care, Center for Endocrine Metabolism and Immune Diseases, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China. zhaodong@ccmu.edu.cn.
Qinghua CuiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, State Key Laboratory of Vascular Homeostasis and Remodeling, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China. cuiqinghua@bjmu.edu.cn.
Liming YangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, People's Republic of China. limingyang@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn.
Peking University · CNBeijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CNDaqing Oilfield General Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College · CNShihezi University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease that could produce severe complications threatening life. Its early detection is thus quite important for the timely prevention and treatment. Normally, fasting blood glucose (FBG) by physical examination is used for large-scale screening of DM; however, some people with normal fasting glucose (NFG) actually have suffered from diabetes but are missed by the examination. This study aimed to investigate whether common physical examination indexes for diabetes can be used to identify the diabetes individuals from the populations with NFG.

methodsThe physical examination data from over 60,000 individuals with NFG in three Chinese cohorts were used. The diabetes patients were defined by HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/mol (6.5%). We constructed the models using multiple machine learning methods, including logistic regression, random forest, deep neural network, and support vector machine, and selected the optimal one on the validation set. A framework using permutation feature importance algorithm was devised to discover the personalized risk factors.

resultsThe prediction model constructed by logistic regression achieved the best performance with an AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.899, 85.0%, and 81.1% on the validation set and 0.872, 77.9%, and 81.0% on the test set, respectively. Following feature selection, the final classifier only requiring 13 features, named as DRING (diabetes risk of individuals with normal fasting glucose), exhibited reliable performance on two newly recruited independent datasets, with the AUC of 0.964 and 0.899, the balanced accuracy of 84.2% and 81.1%, the sensitivity of 100% and 76.2%, and the specificity of 68.3% and 86.0%, respectively. The feature importance ranking analysis revealed that BMI, age, sex, absolute lymphocyte count, and mean corpuscular volume are important factors for the risk stratification of diabetes. With a case, the framework for identifying personalized risk factors revealed FBG, age, and BMI as significant hazard factors that contribute to an increased incidence of diabetes. DRING webserver is available for ease of application ( http://www.cuilab.cn/dring ).

conclusionsDRING was demonstrated to perform well on identifying the diabetes individuals among populations with NFG, which could aid in early diagnosis and interventions for those individuals who are most likely missed.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusFastingGlucoseHumansMachine LearningRisk FactorsGlucoseDiabetes risk predictionMachine learningMissed diagnosisNormal fasting glucose

Identifiers

PMID37674168
PMCPMC10483877
OpenAlexW4386471875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.