Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674159›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2023

Aquaculture ecosystem microbiome at the water-fish interface: the case-study of rainbow trout fed with Tenebrio molitor novel diets.

Antonia Bruno, Anna Sandionigi, Antonella Panio, Simona Rimoldi, Flavio Orizio, Giulia Agostinetto, Imam Hasan, Laura Gasco, Genciana Terova, Massimo Labra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The gills and skin microbiota of five pelagic fish species from the Atlantic Ocean.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Antonia BrunoZooPlantLab, Biotechnology and Biosciences Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. antonia.bruno@unimib.it.
Anna SandionigiQuantia Consulting Srl, Milan, Italy.
Antonella PanioInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), Milan, Italy.
Simona RimoldiDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Flavio OrizioZooPlantLab, Biotechnology and Biosciences Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Giulia AgostinettoZooPlantLab, Biotechnology and Biosciences Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Imam HasanDepartment of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Laura GascoDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Genciana Terova *Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Massimo Labra *ZooPlantLab, Biotechnology and Biosciences Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Insubria · ITNational Research Council · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSustainable aquaculture relies on multiple factors, including water quality, fish diets, and farmed fish. Replacing fishmeal (FM) with alternative protein sources is key for improving sustainability in aquaculture and promoting fish health. Indeed, great research efforts have been made to evaluate novel feed formulations, focusing especially on the effects on the fish gut microbiome. Few studies have explored host-environment interactions. In the present study, we evaluated the influence of novel insect-based (Tenebrio molitor) fish diets on the microbiome at the water-fish interface in an engineered rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farming ecosystem. Using 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding, we comprehensively analyzed the microbiomes of water, tank biofilm, fish intestinal mucus, fish cutis, and feed samples.

resultsCore microbiome analysis revealed the presence of a highly reduced core shared by all sample sources, constituted by Aeromonas spp., in both the control and novel feed test groups. Network analysis showed that samples were clustered based on the sample source, with no significant differences related to the feed formulation tested. Thus, the different diets did not seem to affect the environment (water and tank biofilm) and fish (cutis and intestinal mucus) microbiomes. To disentangle the contribution of feed at a finer scale, we performed a differential abundance analysis and observed differential enrichment/impoverishment in specific taxa, comparing the samples belonging to the control diet group and the insect-based diet group.

conclusionsOmic exploration of the water-fish interface exposes patterns that are otherwise undetected. These data demonstrate a link between the environment and fish and show that subtle but significant differences are caused by feed composition. Thus, the research presented here is a step towards positively influencing the aquaculture environment and its microbiome.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaOncorhynchus mykissTenebrioAnimalsAquacultureDietRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneAquacultureBuilt environmentInsect feedMicrobiomeRainbow trout

Identifiers

PMID37674159
PMCPMC10481543
OpenAlexW4386482610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.