Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674154›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2023

Interventions to enhance healthcare utilisation among pregnant women to reduce maternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries: a review of systematic reviews.

Themba Mzembe, Victor Chikwapulo, Tony Mwenda Kamninga, Ruth Vellemu, Sahra Mohamed, Lomuthando Nthakomwa, Chimwemwe Chifungo, Kerri Wazny, Kelvin Musau, Leila Abdullahi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Themba MzembeAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi. Themba.Mzembe@afidep.org.
Victor ChikwapuloAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Tony Mwenda KamningaEquity and Social Policy, ODI, London, UK.
Ruth VellemuAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Sahra MohamedAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lomuthando NthakomwaAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Chimwemwe ChifungoAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Kerri WaznyThe Children's Investment Fund Foundation, London, UK.
Kelvin MusauThe Children's Investment Fund Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya.
Leila AbdullahiAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Maame PetersonAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Nyovani MadiseAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.
Michael G ChipetaAfrican Institute for Development Policy (AFIDEP), Lilongwe, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) has reduced considerably over the past three decades, but it remains high. Effective interventions are available, but their uptake and coverage remain low. We reviewed and synthesised evidence from systematic reviews on interventions to increase healthcare services utilisation to reduce maternal mortality in LMICs.

methodsWe searched Medline PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for systematic reviews published between January 2014 and December 2021, investigating interventions to increase healthcare services uptake among pregnant women in LMICs. We used the AMSTAR tool (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) to assess the methodological quality of the included reviews. We extracted data on the interventions and their effects and grouped them into broad groups based on the outcomes reported in each systematic review.

resultsWe retrieved 4,022 articles. After removing duplicates and screening, we included 14 systematic reviews. Male-partner interventions were effective in increasing skilled birth attendance (SBA) postnatal visits and maternal antiretroviral (ART) uptake for HIV-positive pregnant women. However, there was no evidence of their effectiveness on increased early ANC initiation or adequate ANC visits. Mobile health interventions were effective in increasing adequate ANC visits, SBA, facility-based service utilisation, early ANC initiation, and adherence to nutritional supplements. Incentive-based interventions, particularly financial incentives, were effective in increasing the number of ANC visits but not postnatal visits. Facility-based interventions were effective in increasing postnatal visits, maternal ART initiation and uptake, immunisation uptake and follow-up ANC visits. None of the reviews assessed their impact on SBA or adequate ANC visits. Community-based interventions were effective in increasing SBA, ANC service utilisation, ART initiation and uptake, and nutritional supplements and immunisation uptake.

conclusionOur findings show that the different interventions effectively improved different outcomes on the maternal healthcare continuum. Implementing these interventions in combination has the potential to enhance healthcare service uptake further.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesTelemedicineFemaleHumansMaleMaternal MortalityPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPregnant PeopleSystematic Reviews as TopicAntenatal careLow and middle incomeMaternal mortalityPostnatal care

Identifiers

PMID37674154
PMCPMC10481488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.