Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37674097›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2024

External validation of a convolutional neural network algorithm for opportunistically detecting vertebral fractures in routine CT scans.

Joeri Nicolaes, Yandong Liu, Yue Zhao, Pengju Huang, Ling Wang, Aihong Yu, Jochen Dunkel, Cesar Libanati, Xiaoguang Cheng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Recognition and reporting of vertebral fractures in thoracic and abdominal computed tomography images - have we learnt our lesson?Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Joeri NicolaesDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), Center for Processing Speech and Images, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. joeri.nicolaes@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2789-8781
Yandong LiuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, China.
Yue ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Qingdao Fuwaicardiovascular Hospital, Qingdao, 26600, China.
Pengju HuangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Anding Hospital, Beijing, 100120, China.
Ling WangDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, China.
Aihong YuDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Anding Hospital, Beijing, 100120, China.
Jochen DunkelUCB Pharma, Monheim, Rhein, Germany.
Cesar LibanatiUCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Xiaoguang ChengDepartment of Radiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, 100035, China.
Peking University · CNBeijing Anding Hospital · CNUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BEUCB Pharma (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Convolutional Neural Network algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 93% in identifying scans with vertebral fractures (VFs). The external validation results suggest that the algorithm provides an opportunity to aid radiologists with the early identification of VFs in routine CT scans of abdomen and chest. PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a previously trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model to automatically detect vertebral fractures (VFs) in CT scans in an external validation cohort.

methodsTwo Chinese studies and clinical data were used to retrospectively select CT scans of the chest, abdomen and thoracolumbar spine in men and women aged ≥50 years. The CT scans were assessed using the semiquantitative (SQ) Genant classification for prevalent VFs in a process blinded to clinical information. The performance of the CNN model was evaluated against reference standard readings by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), accuracy, Cohen's kappa, sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsA total of 4,810 subjects were included, with a median age of 62 years (IQR 56-67), of which 2,654 (55.2%) were females. The scans were acquired between January 2013 and January 2019 on 16 different CT scanners from three different manufacturers. 2,773 (57.7%) were abdominal CTs. A total of 628 scans (13.1%) had ≥1 VF (grade 2-3), representing 899 fractured vertebrae out of a total of 48,584 (1.9%) visualized vertebral bodies. The CNN's performance in identifying scans with ≥1 moderate or severe fractures achieved an AUROC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95), accuracy of 93% (95% CI: 93%-94%), kappa of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72-0.77), a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 92-96%) and a specificity of 93% (95% CI: 93-94%).

conclusionThe algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in the identification of vertebral fractures in a cohort of chest and abdominal CT scans of Chinese patients ≥50 years.

Indexed as

Spinal FracturesAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedConvolutional neural networkOsteoporosisPredictive value of testsTomography, X-Ray computedVertebral body

Identifiers

PMID37674097
PMCPMC10786735
OpenAlexW4386506096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.